Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-133
13 mars 2012
13 mars 2012
In accordance with the Juvenile Courts Act, the public was excluded from the trial because the defendants had been juveniles at the time of the thefts.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-147570
29 septembre 2014
29 septembre 2014
In 2009 the applicant tried to have the preventive measure lifted because of his father’s serious illness and subsequently because of his father’s death.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC001214309
10 juillet 2012
10 juillet 2012
It found that – although the lawyer had indeed breached his mandate – the applicant could not claim from him the damage he considered to have suffered on account of his son’s death, because the respondent
Source officielle7ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_22LY03503_20241205
5 décembre 2024
5 décembre 2024
E, représenté par Me Béchaux, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement ; 2°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 4 mars 2021 ; 3°) de mettre à la charge de l'État une somme de 2 000 euros en application
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0205DEC001433007
5 février 2009
5 février 2009
Because the authorities had failed to pay the benefits in full or in time, the applicants sought relief in courts of the Rostov Region.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1203DEC001211486
3 décembre 1986
3 décembre 1986
fact in making the garnishee order absolute in respect of £5,000 because his bank account allegedly no longer existed.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000970402
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002487494
28 février 1996
28 février 1996
The applicant mainly complains under Article 5 (Art. 5) of the Convention that the revocation of his conditional release and subsequent detention in a mental hospital was unlawful because
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000952002
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicants did enjoy access to a court because they had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115076
6 novembre 2012
6 novembre 2012
On 23 September 2008 the applicant company appealed against the decision claiming, inter alia , that its right under Article 8 of the Convention had been violated because there had been no
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113175
30 août 2012
30 août 2012
By the letter of 24 July 2002 the Justice Department informed the applicant association that the judgment in its favour could not be enforced because an appeal against it was pending. 8.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602DEC005005306
2 juin 2020
2 juin 2020
The court made the award payable immediately because of its significance to the applicant and in view of ever-rising consumer prices.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148779
19 novembre 2014
19 novembre 2014
The applicant further complained relying on Article 18 of the Convention that he had been deprived of his liberty because of his activity as a human rights activist.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164070
26 mai 2016
26 mai 2016
I signed that record because I did not know what was going on, I did not know what I was signing and I did not read what had been written.”
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC001531202
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because she had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC003897197
24 août 1999
24 août 1999
zone of Ayios Stephanos (Monte Smith) and because the expropriation of their share had not been completed within the time-limit provided for in domestic law.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD003364507
20 janvier 2011
20 janvier 2011
In the course of the proceedings the hearings were adjourned once because of the applicant’s failure to appear, once on his request because of his illness, eight times because of the failure
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005DEC003126602
5 octobre 2006
5 octobre 2006
The following hearing, listed for 16 May 2000, was adjourned because the new judge participated in other unrelated proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0714DEC001204986
14 juillet 1988
14 juillet 1988
As of 1 February 1982, the applicant's guardian let the house on lease because it needed renovation. Shortly before that date, the last tenants had left the house.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173638
26 avril 2017
26 avril 2017
Because those people will serve petty political – but mostly their own personal – interests much more readily in order to impose themselves more easily than others, others whose vote they wormed out by
Source officiellePage 48 sur 1499