In response to the inquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 § 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant company stated that it wished to take part in the proceedings pending before the Court

comments in reply.

  The Court finally stated that a claim for compensation for the applicant's detention on remand had to be rejected in accordance with S. 6 para. 1 N° 2 of the Act on Compensation for Prosecution

de préavis outre 1 851,63 euros à titre d'indemnité compensatrice des congés payés afférents; - 3 703,26 euros à titre d'indemnité conventionnelle de rupture, prévue par l'Accord National inter-professionnel

    In 2004 the tax authorities carried out a tax inspection in the first company and concluded that it had failed to declare and pay a considerable amount of tax and that it had, inter alia,

The applicant’s father argued, inter alia, that the defendant was a   commercial company and was using the installations in order to generate profit. 9.

In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the

In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the

On 27 November 1992 he instituted civil proceedings against the Steiermärkische Krankenanstalten Gesm.b.H., the company which administers public hospitals in the region of Styria.

On an unspecified date in 2006 the applicant instituted proceedings against the Municipality seeking compensation in the amount of 1,500 euros (EUR) on account of remuneration for the work in the Commission

The domestic courts ruled against the applicants finding, inter alia , that: in deciding to transfer a plot of land to the applicant the local authorities had exceeded their powers (application no. 14401

In addition, the company had moderators who on their own initiative removed comments in breach of the forum guidelines.

    The applicant alleged that, in particular, he had been deprived of his liberty without compensation in breach of Article 5 §§ 1, 2 and 5 of the Convention; that the compensation proceedings

He complained about, inter alia , overcrowding, poor food and hygiene and lack of activities. He was transferred to a newly renovated wing in June 2002.

    In light of submissions lodged by another company in the field – Suomalainen Energiaosuuskunta (“SEO”) – the Competition Office ( kilpailuvirasto, konkurrensverket ), on 11 October 1993,

L'Association INTER PRODUCTION FORMATION, par déclaration au Greffe reçue le 18 juin 2007, a saisi la Cour d'Appel de MONTPELLIER, désignée comme juridiction de renvoi.

However, this had had no impact on the substantive conclusion, but was to be taken into account in connection with the applicant’s compensation claim.

In 2005 financial compensation was awarded in respect of compensation claims arising out of the Tirana Commission decisions.

    The applicant company is a Romanian limited company whose registered office is in Constanţa.