It thus considers that the complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on it (see   Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of   Valentin   Câmpeanu v.

That conclusion makes it unnecessary to ascertain whether a fair balance was struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual

    Therefore, the domestic courts did not make any genuine attempt to consider the specific reasons advanced by the applicant to justify the need to go abroad, or to assess whether the restriction

against the Republic of Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Bulgarian national, Ms Valentina

detention may be ordered by the court in the absence of the accused unless the latter is undergoing forensic psychiatric examination in an inpatient institution or there are other circumstances that make

The CPT recommends that the Austrian authorities review the current system of Massnahmenvollzug, in the light of the remarks made in paragraphs 103 to 109.

Méndez, made the following submission: 2. Absolute ban on restraints and seclusion “63.

    The Government pointed out that the applicant’s statement of 31   May 2017 that she had been a victim of sexual violence had been made to a psychologist working within a project run

He had subsequently made enquiries about what had become of that form.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

a varying degree, all member States and which does not always surface since it often takes place within personal relationships or closed circuits and affects different family members, although women make

Such institution had to make the necessary arrangements with a view to ensuring the safety of its patients, including from violent acts of other patients. 36.

    As to the applicant’s allegation that L.G. gave the statement against him as a result of coercion, the Court observes that at trial neither the applicant nor L.G. made an arguable claim of

  16064/90 and 8   others, § 111, ECHR 2009, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu , cited above, §   96). 33.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Complaints about the delayed enforcement The Court attaches particular weight to the applicants’ and the heirs’ in cases nos. 38248/09 and 20903/14 express agreement to the terms of the declarations made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made