Romania , no.   24724/03, § 41, 8 November 2007). There is no basis for the Court to reach a different conclusion in the current case.

intended to be a “violent attack against third persons or property”.

They describe themselves as being of Roma origin. 7.

They further submitted that the criminal complaint lodged by the applicants before the prosecutor's office was an effective remedy and that they had made successful use of it.

:Arial; font-style:italic } .s145A6E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:56.7pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-28.35pt; text-align:left; font-size:10pt } .sDC725B32 { width:4.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

Accordingly, there is no need to examine it also in the light of the third criterion stated above (see paragraphs   50–51 above).

There she was stripped of her clothes, put into a car tyre and spun round and round. She was beaten and sprayed with cold water from high-pressure jets.

It follows that on the date they introduced their application to the Court, 20 September 2013, they were still in detention in Korydallos Prison. 36.

The incident (a) The applicants’ version of events At around midnight on 2 August 1998, a group of Roma, who were leaving a restaurant where they had attended a Romani circumcision celebration, were involved

The court further considered that there was a substantial risk that the documents would be withheld, corrupted or destroyed if they were returned. 19.

There has therefore been a violation of Article 6 (art. 6). 31.

    They submit that there is no real risk that the applicant would suffer treatment contrary to Article 3 if he was removed to Germany.

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (…).

that there had been violations of Article 6 of the Convention in respect of the conduct of the criminal proceedings against her; and that there had been a violation of former Article 25 of the Convention

They contended, in the alternative, that there had been no breach of Article 6   §   2. A.     Admissibility 1.

, that they had satisfied the applicable age and nationality requirements).

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s25DB3F80 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt; text-align:left; font-size:10pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman

“Vanda”; it only depended which street they chose to walk into.

    In 2011 the applicants approached a number of solicitors to ask whether they would be prepared to act for them on a no-win no-fee basis in a civil claim against the persons they considered