He also stated that a “large quantity of ammunition had been found under a mattress”.

    During the first three days of detention the applicant was kept in a cold single cell, where he had to sleep on a metal bed without a mattress.

On his admission to a detention facility he was given a mattress and a thin blanket. The food was of poor quality. Inmates were allowed to take a shower three times a month.

He had to sleep on a worn-out mattress and pillow; the water supply and catering were inadequate. Overall, the hygienic and sanitary conditions were unsatisfactory. 2.

Further, cells should be equipped with a means of rest (e.g. a fixed chair or bench), and persons obliged to stay overnight in custody should be provided with a clean mattress and blankets.

    Rule 42 provided that all suspects and accused persons in detention had to be given, among other things: a sleeping place, bedding, including one mattress, a pillow and one blanket; bed linen

    The applicant was given an individual sleeping berth, a mattress, a pillow and a blanket. 46.

Although there had been no proper beds, the applicant had been given a mattress and could sleep on a wooden deck. No bedding had been provided.

It also requires every arrested person to be provided with a bed, mattress and blanket. It further states that a holding cell must be equipped with a toilet, partitioned off from the cell.

    At all times the applicant had an individual sleeping place, bed sheets, a mattress, a pillow, a blanket and towels. He was also provided with a mug, a spoon and a bowl. 29.

As in the case of offenders who are sentenced to detention during Her Majesty's pleasure, offenders who are sentenced to custody for life are also young, not yet fully matured and can also be considered

  It mattered little in this respect that section   5 of the Road Traffic Act, which was applied in the present case, had been enacted after the reservation had been deposited, because that provision

regards what was at stake for the applicant, the Government pointed out that even if the cases had been discussed earlier and the contested decisions of the Cabinet had been annulled, it would not have mattered

O. had further stated that, despite the fact that the personality of the applicant had matured considerably during his confinement, he could not at this stage be expected to abstain from committing any

    The applicant considered that the Government's contention that what mattered was for the sentence to be decided at first instance by a court that satisfied the requirements of Article 6 §

That issue mattered because it was possible to appeal against such a specific decision to more senior prosecutors. 37.

As in the case of offenders who are sentenced to detention at Her Majesty's pleasure, offenders who are sentenced to custody for life are also young, not yet fully matured and can also be considered as

possibility of proving the authenticity of the Note because the logs for the outgoing and incoming mail from the SIS and the President’s office had not been submitted to the courts; it considered that what mattered

  It mattered little in this respect that sections 20 and 52 of the Road Traffic Act, which were applied in the present case, had been enacted after the reservation had been deposited, because those