On 11 May 2005 the applicant filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court ( Verfassungsgerichtshof ) against that decision.

The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 2.

The pecuniary penalty may be imposed in addition to imprisonment. 2.

Article 148-1 “An application for release may … be made by any accused for any reason and at any stage in the proceedings.

Healy (“the applicant”), on 12 May 2016. 2.

    On 22 May 2003 the High Court passed judgment in the criminal trial.

Many of these houses are substandard houses or shelters. For almost fifty years no administration had made any effort to stop or reverse the situation.

    On 26 April and 26 May 2004 hearings were adjourned. 15.

On 30 May 2006 his wife and children expressed their wish to continue the application.

When applying for benefits in Germany the applicant made differing statements as to his employment or working record in Poland.

  20064/21, § 23, May 2023). The first applicant 8.

, may be detained in custody until he is removed from Malta: Provided that if the person in respect of whom a return decision and a removal order has been made is subject to criminal proceedings for a

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Orzeł v.

The men made many representations to the army officials throughout the day and they went to Anshki to make further representations.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 6.

  The facts as submitted by the applicant may be summarised as follows.

The applicant was held in cell no. 95 for several periods: from 5   February to 8 February 1999, from 20 April to 6 May 1999 and from 14   May to 17 May 1999.