CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0418REP002211093
18 avril 1996
damage and to obtain compensation."
Page 47 sur 118
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD006568113
13 janvier 2015
He had not suffered any actual damage, apart from losing the entitlement for the future.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315DEC008162417
15 mars 2022
Civil proceedings for damages 39.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-81452
6 juin 2007
The Minister (or Chief Constable) will conduct a balancing exercise between the damage to the public interest if the material was disclosed and the public interest in disclosure.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0208JUD000069414
8 février 2018
Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Representative name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD002536004
2 octobre 2012
(born in 1988) suffered from a renal condition and scoliosis and that she was in need of her parent’s constant care. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019JUD003649602
19 octobre 2006
Damage 85.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0222JUD005454716
22 février 2022
The relevant damage consists of the expenses borne or to be borne by the person whose rights have been violated, in connection with restoring the violated rights as well as any loss of property or damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD001596604
13 novembre 2012
Everyone shall be liable for any damage he or she causes by breach of a statutory duty. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1202JUD001557803
2 décembre 2010
Non-pecuniary damage 60. The applicant asked the Court to determine the appropriate award in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 61.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0517JUD007136712
17 mai 2022
She also sought to prevent further damage to the property of the club. 39 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0603JUD002044102
3 juin 2010
Damage 64. The applicant claimed non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 30,000 euros (EUR). 65.
Chambre 3-4
69cf6e68cdc6046d47f4fe16
2 avril 2026
FINANCO , demeurant [Adresse 3] représentée par Me Sylvain DAMAZ, avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE S.A.S.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD001724912
15 décembre 2015
Damage 43. The applicant claimed 32,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 44. The Government considered this claim excessive. 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD002610713
3 octobre 2017
Damage 43. The applicant claimed 1,000 euros (EUR) and EUR 100,000 in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage respectively. 44.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1130JUD002612402
30 novembre 2006
Damage 59. The applicant claimed 200,668.56 US dollars plus interest in respect of the damage sustained as a consequence of the length of the proceedings. 60.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD001381306
4 février 2020
As regards the last criterion, it has been the Court’s constant approach that employment disputes require the authorities to act with particular expedition (see, mutatis mutandis , Obermeier v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0220DEC002249693
20 février 1995
He was subject to constant abuse from his interrogators over this period. In order not to freeze to death he had to keep himself awake throughout this time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0227JUD004863619
27 février 2025
It does not stem from the above considerations that the two applicants had a relationship of a “sufficient constancy” (see paragraph 10 above), that they were together in the beginning of 2018 when the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0923JUD006714114
23 septembre 2021
Damage 68. The applicant claimed 10,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 69. The Government contested the claim. 70.