CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

16 978 résultats pour « Callede »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7721

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1997

1 juillet 1997

  Government's preliminary objection Objection that Court lacked jurisdiction ratione materiae not submitted to Court in writing - no decision called for (Rule 48 § 1 of Rules of Court A).

Source officielle

Page 47 sur 849

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196974

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2019

23 septembre 2019

After his release from prison, the Immigration Police repeatedly called on the applicant to leave Switzerland by 31 December 2001 at the latest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49264

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 1986

16 septembre 1986

      Decides, having regard to the information supplied by the Government of the United Kingdom, that no further action is called for in this case.    

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6272

Admin. suprême

20 avril 1999

20 avril 1999

Furthermore, the applicant’s case had been considered by two bodies having full jurisdiction and the fairness of the proceedings before those bodies had not been called into question before the Court:

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51167

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9), but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 14 March 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9988

Admin. suprême

19 février 1991

19 février 1991

  Applicable criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings: to be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, which in this instance called for overall assessment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51301

Admin. suprême

9 février 1996

9 février 1996

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 12 December 1995 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49291

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 1989

10 novembre 1989

violation of Article 6, paragraph 3.c (art. 6-3-c), of the Convention in this case;   Takes note of the information provided by the Government of Italy;   Decides that no further action is called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6462

Admin. suprême

28 août 2012

28 août 2012

Furthermore, the Court of Cassation had clearly been called upon to rule primarily on the employer’s appeal on points that had been examined by the lower courts, that is to say the reasons for and the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9904

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 1992

26 novembre 1992

xa0; Applicable criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings: to be assessed with reference to criteria laid down in Court's case-law and in light of circumstances of case, which in this instance called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49626

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 1995

20 novembre 1995

accordance with Protocol No. 9, but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 13 September 1995 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4167

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2004

5 octobre 2004

He alleged that in 1998, during the war between Eritrea and Ethiopia, there was a general mobilisation and he was called up to serve in the army.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9982

Admin. suprême

19 février 1991

19 février 1991

  Applicable criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings: to be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, which in this instance called for overall assessment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193615

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2019

10 mai 2019

An ambulance was called twice during the applicant’s twelve-hour detention at the centre. He was given painkillers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-200964

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 16231/17 Štefan BUCHA against Slovakia lodged on 20 February 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the inactivity of the tribunal which is called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51542

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 1996

13 septembre 1996

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 15 May 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2215107-2361810

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2007

12 décembre 2007

successfully put in place an effective compensation scheme available to the nearly 80,000 people forced to abandon their properties between 1944 and 1953 in the eastern provinces of pre-war Poland, the so-called

Source officielle
CA

3ème Chambre Commerciale

65b36c728c0355000835f6ee

Appel

26 octobre 2023

26 octobre 2023

[E] [J] Ordonnance d'incident Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Me BUTTIER Me BERNE DE LA CALLE Me MEUNIER RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS

Source officielle
CC

civ1

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C110459

Cassation

12 septembre 2019

12 septembre 2019

A... non daté et non signé, est établi entre la société California dénommée « le réservant » et A... / SCI Calex « acquéreur » ; / Attendu que l'acte authentique du 6 juin 2012 est passé entre la société

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253c8d2bd3db21cbdd865be

Appel

16 octobre 2002

16 octobre 2002

donné certaines consignes de sécurité (telles que travail sans gants, utilisation d'un morceau de bois assez long, aux lieu et place du poussoir en plastique prévu par le constructeur, pour dégager les cales

Source officielle