Rémi BOTTIN Greffier, lors des débats : Mme Corinne MOUILLERON, Commis Assermentée Le Ministère Public ayant eu connaissance de la procédure.

Rémi BOTTIN Greffier, lors des débats : Mme Corinne MOUILLERON, Commis Assermentée Le Ministère Public ayant eu connaissance de la procédure.

Rémi BOTTIN Greffier, lors des débats : Mme Corinne MOUILLERON, Commis Assermentée Le Ministère Public ayant eu connaissance de la procédure.

torts partagés, cette demande doit être rejetée en ce qu'elle est fondée sur l'article 266 du Code civil et retient que Mme Y... n'établissant pas que c'est son mari qui a fait supprimer son nom du Bottin

() Les procédés scientifiques auxquels il est recouru pour la constatation sont les traitements de données topographiques, météorologiques, marégraphiques, houlographiques, morpho-sédimentaires, botaniques

In May 1994 both applicants’ access to the children was restricted to one monthly and supervised visit to the foster home.

  The applicant submits that both cases were simple and that he was not responsible for any delays.

The first applicant was convicted on both counts. The second applicant (Mr   Tahery) was charged, inter alia , with wounding with intent following a gangland stabbing.

Then both perpetrators threatened and beat V.K. and O.K. in order to make them show where they kept cash and jewellery. 1.

Both vehicles had distinctive marks, such as scratches on one side and an aerial, and a white cloth replacing broken windows.

An expert opinion was ordered with a view to assessing the parental competences of both parents.

Upon their divorce they agreed that sole custody over both children would be exercised by the applicant's wife.

Ronan O’Dowd stated that he had observed two men standing beside a red car, possibly a “1300”, close to the house, both men were masked and had “walkie talkie” radios.

Both challenges where dismissed. 20.

  The Court of Appeal found that both sets of proceedings had taken an undesirably long time ("onwenselijk lang").

According to the Government, the hearing was adjourned due to the absence of both parties.

  The court stated in this context that it had heard both children separately and both had made conforming statements according to which the only reason for their reluctance was the father's difficult

    The applicant appealed against both decisions. 16.