In this connection, it was pointed out that he was a member of a criminal organisation, that various kinds of firearms and hand grenades had been found when members of this organisation had been arrested

décision : B N° RG 26/02531 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7K-CNFQP Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 04 mai 2026, à 12h07, par le magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire de Meaux Nous, Laurent Ben-Kemoun

décision : B N° RG 26/02188 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7K-CNCUY Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 17 avril 2026, à 12h05, par le magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire de Meaux Nous, Laurent Ben-Kemoun

décision : B N° RG 26/02178 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7K-CNCUM Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 16 avril 2026, à 17h27, par le magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire de Meaux Nous, Laurent Ben-Kemoun

décision : B N° RG 26/02891 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7K-CNITG Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 22 mai 2026, à 14h21, par le magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire de Meaux Nous, Laurent Ben-Kemoun

#Harry Berg und Johannes Theodorus Maria Busschers gegen Ivo Martin Besselsen.#Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Hoge Raad - Niederlande.

#Specific measures for nuts and locust beans - Changes to the detailed rules for applying them.#Case C-213/91 R.

#Marlies and Heinz-Bernd Kamp v Hauptzollamt Wuppertal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht Düsseldorf - Germany.

Moreover, they had been allowed to enter the applicant’s apartment by his wife.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained that, by reason of his having been both prosecuted and convicted in criminal proceedings for tax fraud and subjected to a tax surcharge, he had been tried and punished

The applicant did not deny that medical supervision had been given and tests had been carried out, or that the prescribed medication had been provided, as indicated in the medical records submitted by

The court noted that the search had been subject to prior judicial approval and had been conducted by authorised persons. 10.

THE LAW The Court notes that on 27 July 2004 the second applicant has been granted a residence permit for the purposes of family reunion.

Berger , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 June 2005, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits

Berg, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Deputy Agent, Ms L. Egmond, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant refused to comply and subsequently noticed that certain food items were missing from the food parcel sent by his family (potatoes and green beans).

    The third event was a rally of the Turkish Workers’ Party held in Köniz (Canton of Berne) on 18 September 2005.

    In response to the prosecutor’s questions, the applicant initially denied attending a conference in Bern, stating that she had never been there.

  On another occasion, the second applicant had been unable to visit his daughter as he had assaulted his wife under the influence of alcohol.