The applicant had owned 40% of the shares in a limited liability company since 1997.

Y... avait commenté des matchs de football pour le compte de la Société d'édition de Canal plus à raison d'interventions variant entre une à dix par mois, de 1996 à 2013, avec une interruption de 2000

The applicants paid in total EUR 22,074.31 in fines and compensation. 16.

  1 to the Convention in relation to the expropriation of the applicants’ property in 2012 and the relevant compensation for that taking. 2.

    On 11 September 2020 the Ljubljana District Court delivered a judgment, awarding the applicant compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage in the amount of EUR 11,070, with statutory

The applicants were awarded about FIM 115,000 in compensation for the land and some additional compensation for the inconvenience suffered. 14.

    On 6 December 2006 the Ankara Civil Court of First Instance ordered the applicant and the publishing company jointly to pay compensation to Mr   Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in the amount of

In June 2017 the applicant company’s CEO, Mr P.   Durov, made a public statement taking note of the envisaged inclusion of the company into the register. 7.

It also noted that, in the subsequent proceedings, the Regional Court would have to decide on the applicant’s compensation claim in the light of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in respect

an effective remedy ( See Appendix for the list of cases in the Timofeyev group )   CM/Inf/DH(2006)19 revised 2 and CM/Inf/DH(2006)45, CM/Inf/DH(2006)19 revised 3     The Committee of Ministers

In this connection the Committee refers to [its decision reported in] Norsk Retstidende 1994, p. 721, where the first voting judge stated, with the approval of the other judges, inter alia :   ‘Compensation

Gambert, avocat général, et Mme Dumont, greffier de chambre, la chambre sociale de la Cour de cassation, composée, en application de l'article R. 431-5 du code de l'organisation judiciaire, des président

On 9 December 1994 the applicant company made an offer to the Government to return the Plant into state ownership in exchange for a certain number of the applicant company’s shares.

    In July 2006, the applicant company borrowed about EUR 5,099,000 from a bank in order to complete the project. 7.

The transitional and final provisions contained in Section 475 of the Code of Civil Procedure inter alia state that if the first-instance judgment was brought after the date of entry into force of the

    The applicant company claimed EUR 4,431.45 in compensation for the damages and court costs that it had paid to A. under the contested judgments.

In the 1990s the applicant, together with others, founded an investment management company. Until 2001 he worked in various positions of responsibility for enterprises within the company.

Ces magistrats ont rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Monsieur Philippe ASNARD, Président de chambre Madame Marie-Anne BLOCH, Conseiller Monsieur Benjamin FAURE

    In the present case, the Schellenberg municipality, being the opposing party in the compensation proceedings at issue, filed comments on the applicants' appeal to the Administrative Court