Since 1952 the applicants’ predecessor had title to a plot of land no. 1339, a pasture (“the plot”).

    The applicant complained of his continuing inability to receive an equivalent plot of land or adequate compensation corresponding to the market value of the disputed plot. 79.

The court also noted that the plot of 5,000 sq. m of land had been leased by Bîra town council to a private company.

    The applicants all own plots of land. Following local land development plans, their plots of land were designated for public use.

    On 3 April 2014 the Brovary Council approved a land management plan whereby the land plot was allocated to the Education Department for its permanent use. 10.

    The applicant argued that S. had no formalised right to his plot of land, only to the house, so could not claim any rights.

    In August 2010 the Lebedyn DSA allocated each applicant two plots of land measuring 2 ha and 0.12 ha, for gardening. The decision mentioned that the plots were “agricultural land”.

It thus ordered the restitution in kind of a plot measuring 1,484 square metres.

On 26 March 2003 he informed the authorities that he wished to receive a new plot of land of equal value.

On the last mentioned date the applicant submitted an additional claim for restoration of a plot of land.

and value to plot no. 2943/6, be transferred into the applicants’ possession. 2.

The plot of land remained municipal property. 3.     All of the applicants were members of the cooperative G. 4.

On 9 October 1990 the General Directorate of National Roads and Highways expropriated three plots of land belonging to the applicant.

They requested compensation in the form of another plot of land. Their son also filed a request asking that a plot of land be allocated to him.

2017 (“the principal judgment”), the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the fact that the applicant had to return to the State a plot

In 1989 and 1992 the applicants concluded contracts with third persons, according to which they acquired de facto possession ( zilyedlik ) of a plot of land in Gökçeada.

A   committee of experts assessed the value of the plot of land belonging to the applicant and this amount was paid to him.

maison au moyen de sabots fixés dans le mur par chevilles et tire-fonds et reposant côté opposé sur une poutre transversale reposant sur deux poteaux en bois accolés au mur séparatif fixés au sol sur des plots

Instead, according to an agreement with Mr   K., they provided him with a comparable land plot and undertook to construct a house for him.