CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

23 798 résultats pour « Held Sutter »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2645000-2889531

Admin. suprême

24 février 2009

24 février 2009

The Court awarded the applicants a total sum of EUR   8,000 for non-pecuniary damage. (The judgment is available only in French.)

Source officielle

Page 46 sur 1190

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708JUD000910304

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

    If an election is declared ‘not held’, or if the election results are deemed invalid in a multi-seat electoral district, a repeat election shall be held.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0620JUD002771595

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2002

20 juin 2002

The x-ray photograph of the first applicant's cranium showed no apparent injuries to his head.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158680

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2015

20 octobre 2015

    The head teacher and the deputy head teacher are the applicants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC001327002

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2005

3 novembre 2005

On 24 October 1997 the court held a hearing at which the expert was heard.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55746

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 1997

17 septembre 1997

that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention in both sets of proceedings;   – held that it was not necessary to consider the applicant's allegations of violations

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1014095-1048476

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2004

27 mai 2004

  After one of the prosecutors referred to in the article had brought proceedings for criminal libel and proffering insults, the Salonika Court of First Instance held that, while the first part of

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68384-68852

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2001

19 juin 2001

Poland (application number 28249/95), the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (access to court) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3205566-3570857

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2010

27 juillet 2010

As he was not able to pay, imprisonment-in-default proceedings were brought under Articles 585 and 586 of the Criminal Code and, in July 2006, the sum in guarantee was converted into detention at the rate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209111

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2021

9 mars 2021

The court held that a legal question had been submitted to the Constitutional Court which led to the adjournment of the hearing in the applicant’s case.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-649806-655496

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2002

13 novembre 2002

Previously, there had been a limit on the number of take-offs and landings between 11.30 p.m. and, on weekdays, 6 a.m. during the summer and 6.30 a.m. during the winter, and 8 a.m. on Sunday mornings,

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-420088-420373

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2001

25 septembre 2001

  The Court decided, unanimously, to award a global sum of 40,000 pounds sterling for costs and expenses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC004759508

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2013

10 septembre 2013

    The applicant has informed the Court that he was held in detention in Italy from 2001 until September 2006 for events unrelated to the present case. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0927JUD000739807

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2012

27 septembre 2012

It has held that “a comprehensive view must be taken of the applicable procedures” (see Jokela v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56394

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2002

30 avril 2002

that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention; - held that no separate issue arose under Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 8; - held that there had been no

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0429JUD000234602

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2002

29 avril 2002

But her physical incapacity is now such that she can no longer, without help, take her own life. With the support of her family, she wishes to enlist the help of her husband to that end.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC002136907

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2010

2 novembre 2010

    Access proceedings On 15   July 2003 the Hamburg District Court held an oral hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0718JUD001515218

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2023

18 juillet 2023

The requested sum of EUR   1,694 was supported by documents. 31 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1219JUD007384101

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2006

19 décembre 2006

Ruling on an equitable basis, it awards EUR 2,000 under that head. B.     Costs and expenses 49.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184564

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2018

14 juin 2018

The Commission’s hearings shall as a rule be held publicly. Closed hearings, which may only be attended by the persons invited by the Commission, may be held per a decision of the Commission. 3.

Source officielle