The applicant then acknowledged the acts imputed to him and pleaded guilty.

In particular, that the evidence against him at the time of his arrest was not sufficient to lead to the conclusion that he was guilty of an offence. 2.

    By a judgment of 10 January 2013 the applicant was found guilty of money laundering and sentenced to five years and six months’ imprisonment.

A   finding of guilt in the absence of a final conviction must be distinguished, in that context, from the description of a “state of suspicion”.

In the course of those proceedings, the applicant was ultimately found guilty of illicit drugs trafficking and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment.

In 2012 the applicant was found guilty and convicted to pay a fine in the amount of 10,000 Croatian kunas (HRK) in administrative tax proceedings for the minor-offence under the Value Added Tax Act of

Emile A..., demeurant Bois Hervé à Saint-Malo-des-Trois-Fontaines à Guilliers (Morbihan), 4°/ de M. Eugène B..., demeurant Ricourtel à Ploermel (Morbihan), 5°/ de M.

’s Office for correction of shortcomings and noted, inter alia , that in the bill of indictment the applicant had been referred to as a person who had committed the above crime in the absence of his guilt

pre-trial investigation and re-trials; outcome: discontinuation of proceedings by the prosecution authorities at the pre-trial investigation stage on the ground that there was no evidence of the applicant’s guilt

On 26 June 2007 the Vuktyl Town Court found the applicant guilty of abuse of office and sentenced him to a year of imprisonment.

In his decision he established that the applicant was guilty of two counts of aggravated fraud and two counts of attempted aggravated fraud.

By judgment of 12 March 1996 the Sofia City Court found the applicant guilty of premeditated murder with hooligan motives, committed with extreme viciousness and in a manner particularly cruel to the victim

[The court] found Tadeusz L., deputy mayor and Lech   K., legal adviser, guilty of an attempt by local government officials to take over a private company – unprecedented in this country.

    The applicant’s conviction in Latvia By a judgment of 4 October 2004 the Riga Regional Court convicted the applicant as being guilty of an attempted coup d’état for having participated in

-M. acknowledged their guilt and requested that life imprisonment be replaced with a fixed-term sentence, whereas G. denied his guilt and requested that the case be remitted to the first-instance court

If the court found the accused guilty as charged, the victim could be awarded full or partial compensation (section   101(2)). 23.

   Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed      innocent until proved guilty according to law."

On 9 May 2005 the Court of First Instance found the applicant guilty of jeopardising traffic, sentenced him to two years of imprisonment and prohibited him from driving.

On 29   July 2009 the applicant was found guilty of infringing residency regulations, which amounted to an administrative offence under Article 18.8 of the Code of Administrative Offences.