à déclaration en application des articles L. 214-1 à L. 214-6 du même code.

  75225/13 and 77311/13) against the Republic of Malta lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two

, on the basis of Articles   220 § 7 and 314 § 3 of the same Code.

On 1 December 2003, pursuant to Article 158e of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“the CCP”) an undercover police agent infiltrated the team of customs officers.

du code pénal.

] is charged with aggravated murder under Article 144 § 1 (1) and (4) of the Criminal Code, and having in mind that the provided sentence is between 10 and 40 years of imprisonment, the first condition

    Admissibility 34.     The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.

Toutefois, ce préjudice excédant le taux de 30   % fixé par le législateur n’est pas celui dont il est question à l’article 105 du code des obligations (…).

Since the second applicant was charged with a serious criminal offence, Article 255 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permitted the trial court to approve one or more extensions of his detention of no

méconnaît l’article L. 111-11 du code de l’urbanisme ; - il méconnaît l’article L. 2511-30 du code général des collectivités territoriales, le maire d’arrondissement ayant été saisi antérieurement à la

    Article 199 bis of the Criminal Code, as amended by Chapter   2, Article   7 of Law no. 28 of 26 February 2004, and by Article   77 (2) of Law no.

[The applicant] has been informed of his rights and obligations under Articles   48 and 51 of the Constitution, and Articles 1.5, 24.2 and 25.1 of the CAO: that the person who is being prosecuted

    Le 1 er novembre 2004, la Cour a modifié la composition de ses sections (article 25 § 1 du règlement).

The claim was based on Article 77 of   the Constitution and Article 417 of the Civil Code (see paragraphs 49 and 53   below).

    The case originated in an application (no. 53971/00) against the French Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

    Dans l’intervalle, le parquet d’Istanbul décida, le 25   octobre 2017, de prolonger de sept jours la détention du requérant, conformément à l’article   91 du code de procédure pénale

IZ-34/1 in Volgograd.

  It rejected the remainder of the application and decided to take no further action in respect of the complaint concerning effective exercise of the right of petition (Article 25 para. 1 in fine)

. : Sur le premier moyen de cassation, pris de la violation des articles 222-38 du Code pénal et 415 du Code des douanes, 459, 520, 552 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale, défaut de motifs, manque de