CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11265
28 juin 2016
The climate of impunity thus created had allowed the husband to continue assaulting his wife without fear of prosecution.
Page 45 sur 606
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0926DEC006729510
26 septembre 2017
In 2011, the applicant was expelled to Tunisia, where he was subsequently joined by his wife and four children, who are all Dutch nationals. 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1208DEC002401502
8 décembre 2005
Two further witnesses stated that the victim and his wife had been in an inebriated state.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0705DEC001774891
5 juillet 1994
On 22 April 1988 the applicant and his wife had a meeting with Mr. L.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0713DEC001224686
13 juillet 1987
Moreover, the applicant had in principle agreed that his former wife should take care of their daughter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1010DEC001560189
10 octobre 1991
to thefamily home and awarded custody of the children to both the applicant and his wife.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0914DEC005025299
14 septembre 2004
The spouses had merely not cohabited for a number of months because of marital problems; however, the first applicant had remained in contact with his wife.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC002628395
26 juin 1996
On 14 July 1993 the applicant's former wife commented on the applicant's appeal.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD003786202
29 mai 2012
On 18 May 2000 the applicant’s wife gave birth to their son. 13. On 16 November 2000 and 20 November 2001 the applicant received two short-term visits from his wife.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122DEC000892312
22 novembre 2016
The court was of the view that there was no prospect of him returning to his wife. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC002514116
17 octobre 2017
On 29 December 2007 the applicant and his wife arrived in Sweden.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0119JUD000477206
19 janvier 2017
On 15 September 2003 the applicant’s wife hired a lawyer, G., to represent the applicant. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD000226010
10 juillet 2014
The applicant’s wife was requested to attend an interview at the consulate on 21 February 2008.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD006837717
25 février 2020
After the wife and her sister left the Gurdwara , the sister had been seized and dragged into a white car by unknown men. Unlike the wife, the sister had not yet put on her burqa.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD006642409
1 juillet 2021
The applicant’s conduct in prison and regular visits from his wife and relatives 11. In 2008 the applicant got married. He had a child with his wife.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0630REP001483089
30 juin 1992
The applicant arrived at Manchester Airport on 8 August 1987 and sought leave to enter to rejoin his wife.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9175
19 février 1996
Turkey - original reasons for his application for political asylum no longer valid - possible for applicant to receive his ordinary invalidity pension if he returned to his country - possible for his wife
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115711
7 décembre 2010
On 4 January 2005 the applicant’s former common-law wife gave birth to a girl.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14513
29 avril 2025
- 39631/20 Judgment 29.4.2025 [Section II] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for correspondence Prison authorities’ refusal to hand over to a prisoner voluminous internet printouts posted to him by his wife
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:SO10189
17 février 2016
société par actions simplifiée, dont le siège est [Adresse 3], 2°/ à la société Nexans France, société par actions simplifiée unipersonnelle, dont le siège est [Adresse 2], 3°/ à la société Nexans Wires