CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 285 résultats pour « Valentin MACE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0620JUD000882620

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2024

20 juin 2024

During the inspection of his documents, they removed the written statement made by A.H. in order to show it to the prison governor.

Page 45 sur 65

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-165530

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2016

7 juillet 2016

She had also allegedly made a written note that R.Z. was a repeat blood recipient.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0128JUD000853113

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2021

28 janvier 2021

However, reference will still be made to “the applicant” throughout the present text. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §   1 OF THE CONVENTION 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1014JUD006227616

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2021

14 octobre 2021

    The Court further observes that the applicants made use of the existing domestic remedy.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209JUD007523710

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2021

9 décembre 2021

applicant purchased in 2003 and the part regarding which it had the right of permanent lease (see paragraph 6 above), had a basis in domestic law, references to specific legal provisions having been made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0719JUD006208210

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2022

19 juillet 2022

It thus considers that this complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on its merits (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD007949417

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2020

16 janvier 2020

    The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0704JUD001985710

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2023

4 juillet 2023

The domestic authorities had made every effort to ensure the applicant’s contact with the child. The Court’s assessment 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD002989516

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2026

2 avril 2026

In reaching this conclusion, the appellate court relied on the following arguments: “The search warrant does not include the reasons it was made and fails to take into account other points necessary for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519JUD005828219

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2022

19 mai 2022

K.P. had attended supportive therapy and counselling, had made notable progress and had become more self-critical about the children’s upbringing and her behaviour towards them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121JUD007773612

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2024

21 novembre 2024

    Overall, it appears that, as a result of the decisions made by the domestic courts with a view to protecting the rights of S.M., the former owner’s heir, the expense of correcting the wrongs

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC003124309

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

The applicant further alleged that he had received confirmation that his siblings had been killed by “Valentine” upon order by Adolphe   Nshimirimana, a general within the Secret Service.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625JUD000223616

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2019

25 juin 2019

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102JUD002119903

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2010

2 novembre 2010

APRON DYNAMICS SRL BAIA MARE v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD005042308

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2020

22 octobre 2020

Between 9.15 and 10 a.m. the judge’s assistant made calls to Mr Zohrabyan’s mobile telephone but he did not answer. 21 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919JUD006664110

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

    The Serbian Government made no comment in this regard. β)     The Court’s conclusion 83.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1819948-1922627

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2006

30 octobre 2006

Moldova (no. 75975/01) The applicant, Valentina Drăguţă, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1951 and lives in Chişinău.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0924DEC003955216

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2019

24 septembre 2019

and explicit instructions from the alleged victim, within the meaning of Article 34, on whose behalf they purport to act before the Court (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1028JUD005086816

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2021

28 octobre 2021

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0620JUD000920318

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2024

20 juin 2024

Hungary (no. 36037/17, §   52, 2   March 2021) the Court made an assessment of the general living conditions in the Röszke transit zone.

Source officielle