E B, représenté par Me Eftimie-Spitz, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté MFT du 5 février 2025 portant établissement de la promotion interne pour l'accès au cadre d'emplois des ingénieurs au

E C, représenté par Me Eftimie-Spitz, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision du 21 octobre 2022 par laquelle le vice-président de la Polynésie française a refusé d'accorder à M.

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE LYON Chambre 3 cab 03 D N° RG 22/09037 - N° Portalis DB2H-W-B7G-XFO2 Notifiée le : Grosse et copie à : Me Julie CURTO - 2044 Me Nathalie SPELTZ -

Having regard to the above application lodged on 22 July 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Tonći Katavić, is a Croatian national who was born in 1977 and lives in Split

declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Mr Siniša Štimac, a Croatian national who was born in 1950 and lives in Split

  Gulišija, a lawyer practising in Split. The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik.

Spitz, Auditeur, - les observations de la SCP Defrénois, Lévis, avocat de M.

Spitz, Auditeur, - les observations de Me Choucroy, avocat de Mme X... et de la S.C.I. Seigneurie de Vinay et de la S.C.P.

declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Ms Milka Ušaj, is a Croatian national, who was born in 1947 and lives in Split

Croatia and Ivica MEDAK against Croatia lodged on 18 July 2022 and 2 August 2022 respectively communicated on 13 November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE On 24 July 2009 a train travelling from Zagreb to Split

declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicant, Ms Karmen Natrlin, is a Croatian national, who was born in 1949 and lives in Split

Fabjanović, a lawyer practising in Split. The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik.

The applicant’s appeal against the first-instance decision was dismissed by the Split County Court on 25 May 2020, and her subsequent constitutional complaint was dismissed by the Constitutional Court

demeurant [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] Madame [C] [E], demeurant [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] représentés par Maître Me Isabelle DE LIPSKI, avocat au barreau de PARIS - #D0669 COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL Clara SPITZ

Spitz, Maître des Requêtes, - les observations de la SCP Waquet, Farge, Hazan, avocat de M. X..., - les conclusions de M.

Spitz, Maître des Requêtes, - les conclusions de M.

Spitz, Maître des Requêtes, - les observations de la SCP de Chaisemartin, Courjon, avocat de la fédération départementale des chasseurs de la Côte-d'Or, - les conclusions de M.

Spitz, Maître des Requêtes, - les conclusions de M. Seban, Commissaire du gouvernement ; Sur la légalité de l'arrêté du 27 novembre 1998 ordonnant la reconduite à la frontière de M.