AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148129
22 octobre 2014
22 octobre 2014
other interpretation of this provision would effectively mean that the competent authorities “could search every place and everyone” at any point in time (see Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku , Prof
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0621DEC005332317
21 juin 2018
21 juin 2018
According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Ananyev
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248749
22 janvier 2026
22 janvier 2026
They are further requested to provide proof of notification of such documents to the applicant and copies of any records demonstrating the applicant’s access to, or waiver of, legal assistance and/or interpretation
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC002564017
13 septembre 2018
13 septembre 2018
According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Ananyev
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14439
11 février 2025
11 février 2025
Accepting such repayment under the compensation scheme was voluntary; a former holder would be able to refuse payment and seek full compensation in court proceedings in which the burden of proof regarding
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226263
10 juillet 2023
10 juillet 2023
In particular, the applicants complain, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, of the excessive burden of proof as to the ownership and origin of the assets, of the use of presumptions and that the courts
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110DEC004706115
10 novembre 2022
10 novembre 2022
According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Ananyev
Source officielleCour d'Appel
Monsieur Alain Xc/Monsieur Eric Y
6253cd19bd3db21cbdd92417
13 mai 2015
13 mai 2015
Au total le préjudice sera évalué comme suit : préjudice évaluation organisme social victime Dépenses de Santé Actuelles 5. 614, 33 ¿ 773, 17 ¿ 4. 841, 16 ¿ frais divers 490 ¿ 490 ¿ préjudice profes
Source officielle2ème Chambre
DTA_2301322_20250605
5 juin 2025
5 juin 2025
En l'espèce, il ressort des pièces du dossier que, par message sur l'application dédiée I-PROF en date du 20 avril 2023, Mme B a été informée qu'elle ne remplissait pas les conditions pour être promue
Source officielle4ème Chambre
DCA_20VE03248_20221108
8 novembre 2022
8 novembre 2022
C D a demandé au tribunal administratif de Versailles d'annuler l'arrêté n° 2018-PREF-DCSIPC/BSIOP/n° 616 du 28 juin 2018 par lequel le préfet de l'Essonne a procédé à la saisie administrative de matériels
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307DEC003765916
7 mars 2019
7 mars 2019
According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Ananyev
Source officielle10eme Chambre
DTA_2109502_20250722
22 juillet 2025
22 juillet 2025
Or, d'une part, il est constant que la commune de Ventabren n'était pas couverte par un plan de prévention des risques incendie de forêt (PPRIF) à la date du certificat d'urbanisme contesté et qu'un tel
Source officielle6ème Chambre
DTA_2206009_20250506
6 mai 2025
6 mai 2025
et Mme C, pour un projet situé sur la parcelle BX 131 au sein du lotissement de la Ferme de Taussat, au motif qu'en raison de l'exposition de la parcelle au risque incendie, ce projet contrevenait au PPRIF
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1399995-1461798
15 juillet 2005
15 juillet 2005
Decision of the Court Article 2 The circumstances in which the applicant’s husband died The Court said that, in assessing the evidence, it adopted the standard of proof “beyond reasonable
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0316DEC004324917
16 mars 2023
16 mars 2023
According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Ananyev
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5589
26 février 2002
26 février 2002
In so far as the Government maintained that the statement was one of fact and could therefore be proved, since proof of “incitement to hatred” could be established in criminal proceedings, the degree of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196975
24 septembre 2019
24 septembre 2019
According to the applicant, he was not immediately released following receipt of that information as the GPO requested further proof of the applicant’s refugee status.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1023DEC003082212
23 octobre 2018
23 octobre 2018
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the second-instance court’s excessive formalism with regard to the burden of proof and under Article 1 of Protocol No.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207903
11 janvier 2021
11 janvier 2021
(b) Have the authorities discharged their burden of proof by providing a plausible or satisfactory and convincing explanation of how the applicant’s injuries were caused (see Salman v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206547
9 novembre 2020
9 novembre 2020
The court also stated that “the materials in the case file do not contain proof of absence of a possibility of a violation of rights and freedoms of persons [not participating in the assembly] ...”.
Source officiellePage 45 sur 477