On 4 July 1989 an inspection was made on the applicant's premises.

Turning to the instant case, the Court observes that on 19   August 2002 the domestic court made a monetary award in the applicant’s favour.

    Turning to the case at hand, the Court notes that the proceedings involved many parties and were therefore of a certain complexity.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4 .

– if need be and on the application made by the [relevant] prosecutor – prolong detention for a period [or periods] which as a whole may not exceed 12 months. 3.

On 8 May 2001 the applicant requested full access to the case-file, which was refused on 17 May 2001 pending the pre-trial investigation.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1. Main proceedings 3.

had only been completed by the end of May 2012.

It may be subject to editorial revision.

They made no complaint about the procedure at that time.

    statements made by the defendant; 3 o .     statements made by witnesses; 4 o . statements made by experts; 5 o .     written documents. 2.

An Act of 19th May 1914 made primary education compulsory.

Coombs made a fraudulent claim in 1989 for a further GBP 2 million and that it transpired that the shares were in fact worthless.

    On 16 May 2008 the applicant association lodged an appeal against the decision of 14 May 2008 (see paragraph 9 above).

(b)     Proceedings before the Constitutional Court On 26 May 2015 the applicant appealed to the Constitutional Court.

Apparently, she made a similar request on 24 May 1993.

– if need be and on an application made by the [relevant] prosecutor – prolong detention for a period [or periods] which as a whole may not exceed 12 months. 3.

If this case [ Bavčar ] becomes time-barred, let me say here: I have made a commitment many times on your show, and I hope that I have delivered.

They were mentioned for the first time in the applicant’s submissions on just satisfaction of 21 May 2012. In sum, no award can be made for loss of salaries, pensions and savings.