On 23 March 1982 the Stuttgart Labour Court (Arbeitsgericht) granted the action.

On 29 January 2004 the Labour Court accepted most of the applicant’s claim, but failed to address the entirety of his claims.

    X brought labour action against the applicant company, claiming unlawful dismissal. 7.

Nevertheless, the work performed was not to be considered as forced or compulsory labour.

CHUBB EUROPEAN GROUP SE TOUR CARPE [Adresse 1] Ayant pour avocat plaidant Me Matthieu PATRIMONIO en la personne de Me REEK Richard, avocat au barreau de Paris, et pour avocat postulant, Me Florent LADOUCE

Again, slavery might not in any way involve forced labour but merely involve a state of ownership.

    The text of Article 195 § 3 of the Labour Act of 2005 corresponds to the aforementioned Article 122 § 3 of the Labour Act of 2001. C.

In any event, the applicant had not specified which of his arguments the Regional Labour Court had failed to take into account. B.

    On 22 December 1998 the applicant instituted proceedings before the Kranj Divison of the Labour and Social Court. 10.

Expert Medical Commission and the Central Labour Expert Medical Commission in 1998 to classify his disability status as first-degree (violation of Article 6§1).

On 11 October 2001 the Labour Market Service dismissed his request.

The Labour Court found the dismissal to be unjustified. The Higher Labour Court reversed the judgment, and deemed the applicant to be unsuited to continue teaching.

The applicant lodged an appeal with the Madrid Labour Court (no. 10); that appeal was dismissed, whereas Madrid Labour Court (no. 34) set aside the penalty imposed on L.C.M.

  1: The applicants had been entitled, under the provisions of labour legislation, to obtain salary and various other payments to be paid by their employer, a State entity, upon dismissal.

In the early morning hours of 6 October 2002 she had the first signs of labour. At 7 a.m. she was taken to the labour room. At 8   a.m. the foetal heartbeat monitoring equipment broke down.

France - 73316/01 Judgment 26.7.2005 [Section II] Article 4 Article 4-1 Servitude Article 4-2 Forced labour Foreign minor without residence papers placed against her will into a situation of dependence

The applicant challenged that decision before the Labour and Social Court in Ljubljana.

euros par mois à compter du 1er juillet 2026 avec indexation, en réparation des préjudices qu'elle a subis du fait de l'accident dont elle a été victime alors qu'elle assistait à la manifestation " Labour

    First set of proceedings On 10 September 1991 the applicant instituted a labour dispute before the Ljubljana Labour Court ( Delovno in socialno sodišče v Ljubljani ) against his former employer