the hearing.

Austria - 29544/95 Judgment 1.8.2000 [Section III] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Oral hearing Lack of oral hearing before Administrative Court: violation Facts : The applicant

The trial court decided to adjourn the hearing until 13 December 2006. 12.

It appears that the applicant’s lawyer did not attend the hearing. He refers to the incoming mail log of his law firm to show that the court had failed to notify him about this hearing.

The next hearings were held on 13 February and 15 March 2006. The applicant was absent at the latter hearing. He claimed that he had been summoned to a hearing before the Poznań District Court.

The preparatory hearing On 31 October 2000 the court held a preparatory hearing, mainly to discuss the obtaining of oral evidence.

    On 17 March 1992 the City Court informed the parties that an oral hearing was scheduled for 17 and 18 November 1992, which hearing took place after the City Court had refused a request by

hearings in criminal proceedings.

His duties include deciding whether a case should be referred to a children’s hearing and arranging such hearings when they are necessary. (c) Children’s hearings 47.

The hearing thus began on that date with Kronides J and four hearing sessions were held until 8 March 1996.

On 27 June 1986 the applicant applied for the action to be fixed for hearing. The hearing was fixed for 7 October 1986.

On 14 January, 18 April and 2 September 1997 the Pest Central District Court held hearings.

As to the applicability of Article 6 under its criminal heading, no criminal charges were ever brought against the applicant.

The heating was inadequate and the food of low quality. No toiletries were provided and there was no permanent duty doctor.

She wants to attend the hearing no matter what.

In 1992 two hearings were adjourned. On 16 February 1993 the court held a hearing at which it heard the parties and witnesses and ordered an expert opinion. B.

    On 17 April 2006 the Kyiv City Court of Appeal informed him that the hearing in his case would take place on 8 June 2006. 11.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, a violation of his right to a fair hearing. 4.     On 27 May 2010 the application was communicated to the Government.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms)