They waive all further claims against the Federal Republic of Germany and/or the Land of Saxony and/or the City of Dresden arising from the facts of the present case. 3.

    The applicants were born in 1946 and 1947 respectively and live in Dortmund in Germany. 9.

M [P] [D] a été désigné en qualité de gérant, à la suite de son père.

The hearing set for 18/04/2008 had to be cancelled as the applicant had left Germany before the summons was sent.

citizen born in 1952, is a journalist currently apparently resident in Butzbach in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Germany [GC], no.   25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000-VIII).

occupation forces assumed supreme authority with respect to Germany.

    Thereafter the applicant went by taxi to Cizre where she was again interrogated for an hour by a German speaking member of the Turkish army. From Cizre she went by bus to Diyarbakĸr.

He was suspected of being willing to participate in or carry out a terrorist attack in Germany.

} .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2010)52 [1] Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Kaemena and Thöneböhn against Germany

Furthermore, Germany had to abide by the Court’s judgment and the applicant could not institute a new set of proceedings concerning contact rights in Germany due to the lack of jurisdiction by the German

GERMANY   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing a judgment [1] in the case of Stambuk v. Germany (application no. 37928/97).

  According to the findings of the court the applicant entered the Federal Republic of Germany in 1979 and made a request to be granted asylum.

Germany (application no. 19359/04)   COURT’S JUDGMENT CONCERNING RETROACTIVE EXTENSION OF A PRISONER’S PREVENTIVE DETENTION BECOMES FINAL   The five-judge panel of the Grand Chamber, meeting

#Steinike & Weinlig v Federal Republic of Germany.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main - Germany.#Case 78-76.

                      against Germany         The European Commission

Following the applicant’s arrest in Turkey, his wife and children left Germany to join him.

Germain, contre l'arrêt de la chambre de l'instruction de la cour d'appel de TOULOUSE, en date du 4 mai 2001, qui, dans l'information suivie contre lui pour enlèvement, assassinat, vol et escroqueries

; qu'ainsi, de 1996 à 1997, la comptabilité a enregistré des flux financiers de l'ASJD vers la Sogecat à hauteur de la somme de 2 235 000 francs ; qu'avant de démissionner le 25 juillet 1997 de la gérance