the German Criminal Code (StGB), inter alia, if the convicted is an habitual offender representing a danger to society because of a tendency to commit offences causing serious bodily harm or material damage

prejudice‑motivated crimes would unavoidably be treated on an equal footing with ordinary cases without such overtones, and the resultant indifference would be tantamount to official acquiescence to or even connivance

né le 02 Janvier 1955 à DAMAS (SYRIE) ... 11300 LIMOUX représenté par la SCP JOUGLA-JOUGLA, avoués à la Cour assisté de Me Laetitia FOUQUENET, avocat au barreau de CARCASSONNE COMPOSITION DE LA

  Under Article 41 (just satisfaction) of the Convention, the Court awarded the applicant 1,400   euros (EUR) for pecuniary damage, EUR 15,000 for non-pecuniary damage and EUR   3,500 for

    Damage 83.

    Damage 50.     The applicant claimed 12,230 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage.

They maintained that he had not lodged a claim with the civil courts for compensation for damage suffered due to the excessive length of the proceedings.

    The 1988 State and Municipalities Responsibility for Damage Act 20.

All of them jointly were ordered to pay the applicant 10,000,000 Romanian lei in civil damages. 4.

Sergeant M., Constable B., and Constable R. made written statements.

When the Coroner accepted that the evidence should be admitted, the RUC Chief Constable applied for judicial review of those decisions.

En réponse la société CIC EST fait valoir que la demande de résiliation judiciaire n'est pas fondée et que le licenciement, pour inaptitude constatée par le médecin du travail et impossiblité de reclasser

    Damage 36.     The applicant claimed 1,598.79 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage for reimbursement of the fine and the procedural costs imposed on him. 37.

H. were ordered to pay compensation in the amount of 2.475- AS for damages resulting from the construction project.

    The applicant claimed 8,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 1,359.40 in respect of the costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court. 27.

    Damage 45.     The applicant claimed 100,000 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. 46.

    Damage 35.     The first and the second applicants did not make any claims. The third applicant claimed EUR 1,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 36.

The applicant submitted that the regime involved, in particular, daily strip searches and constant monitoring of the cell, including the toilet.

7 month(s) and 28 day(s)   overcrowding, passive smoking, insufficient natural light, mouldy or dirty cell, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, poor quality of food, constant