Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216642
4 mars 2022
4 mars 2022
Together with their parents, they had fled to Lebanon from Syria because of the war in the latter country. The applicant’s brother had then travelled to the Netherlands where he was granted asylum.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243281
23 avril 2025
23 avril 2025
On 25 November 2022 Minister of Justice applied to the Supreme Judicial Council (“the SJC”) to subject the applicant – a first-instance court judge at the material time – to a disciplinary measure because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204803
31 août 2020
31 août 2020
lodged on 17 May 2013 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the detention of a Somalian asylum seeker in Ukraine which he considers was in breach of Article 5 of the Convention, notably because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-120330
10 mai 2013
10 mai 2013
COMPLAINTS Under Article 3 of the Convention the applicant claims that if expelled he would be at risk of ill-treatment because the Sri Lankan government is likely to suspect him of supporting the Liberation
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3047
9 novembre 2006
9 novembre 2006
Turkey - 11449/02 Judgment 9.11.2006 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Refusal of retrial to challenge paternity finding because scientific progress (DNA test) was not
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6062
29 février 2000
29 février 2000
(Relinquishment of jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber is recommended not only because of the importance of the decision for France but also because of the particular interest of the complaint
Source officielle4ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_23LY00131_20230921
21 septembre 2023
21 septembre 2023
C, représenté par Me Béchaux, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement ; 2°) d'annuler cet arrêté ; 3°) d'enjoindre à la préfète du Rhône de lui délivrer un titre de séjour au titre de la vie
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224649
12 avril 2023
12 avril 2023
Security, relying on this criminal record, revoked the applicant’s residence permit on the basis of section 3.86 of the Aliens Decree ( Vreemdelingenbesluit ), as in force since 1 July 2012, because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-239174
9 décembre 2024
9 décembre 2024
She argued, in particular, that because company N. had been liquidated, no claim could be raised against it.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224009
6 mars 2023
6 mars 2023
The Croatian Pension Fund refused her request because she had not been registered as an insured person in the pension fund ran by the occupying authorities.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-121062
13 mai 2013
13 mai 2013
The applicant states that the conditions of his detention, before September 2012, were inhuman, because of the overcrowded cells, dirtiness and the lack of hygiene.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Lyon
ORTA_2516079_20260120
20 janvier 2026
20 janvier 2026
C..., représenté par Me Bechaux, demande au juge des référés d’assurer l’exécution de l’ordonnance du 30 décembre 2024 en enjoignant à la préfète du Rhône de le convoquer pour lui remettre son titre de
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD001397903
18 décembre 2008
18 décembre 2008
The applicant rejected these offers because he considered that the command should have first satisfied his claims for other benefits, and because he disliked the flats’ characteristics. II.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-165530
7 juillet 2016
7 juillet 2016
The blood was not collected because of the patient’s death. At 2.36 p.m. R.Z. was transferred to the intensive care unit. He died there at 3.15 p.m.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0107DEC001133485
7 janvier 1991
7 janvier 1991
Nor had the proceedings been unfair and contrary to Article 6 of the Convention because the applicant company had in fact been heard.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0618JUD003280503
18 juin 2009
18 juin 2009
The next hearing listed for 26 January 2004 was adjourned because the presiding judge was ill. 21.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC004805809
6 septembre 2011
6 septembre 2011
That complaint was thus declared manifestly ill-founded because the character of the detention was not “essentially different”.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928JUD002608902
28 septembre 2006
28 septembre 2006
On 10 February 1998 the criminal proceedings against the applicant were discontinued because his guilt had not been proven. 7.
Source officiellecr
6079a8a69ba5988459c4e5e3
26 juin 1968
26 juin 1968
RECEVABLE LORSQUE, FORME APRES LE JUGEMENT SUR LE FOND, IL INTERVIENT DANS LES DELAIS PREVUS PAR LES ARTICLES 498 ET SUIVANTS DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; ATTENDU QU'IL APPERT DE LA PROCEDURE QUE BECHARD
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0118JUD003983298
18 janvier 2005
18 janvier 2005
Three hearings listed for 7 and 21 May and 4 June 2002 did not take place because the Customs Agency had not been duly summoned. 28.
Source officiellePage 45 sur 1499