CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 493 résultats pour « Alexandre BECAUD »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327JUD000543207

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2012

27 mars 2012

The servicemen had thrown them a blanket and a sweater because it had been freezing. He had heard the women cry in the pit.

Page 45 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD003795611

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2013

8 janvier 2013

Owing to her health – advanced scoliosis – she is not able to pick the child up, hold him in her arms, run after him, or prevent him from hurting himself, because the scoliosis prevents her from moving

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD004110810

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

This is because the accused himself has stated in his defence that he had been a recognised doctor and also a medical expert for a number of years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0328JUD001019508

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2013

28 mars 2013

    On 12 October 2007 the criminal investigation in respect of the third applicant was terminated because it could not be established that an offence had been committed. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124JUD002489305

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

    Witness Sh. could not appear because of his state of health and the distance of over one thousand kilometres between his home town of Irkutsk and the location of the trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0404JUD002893214

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2019

4 avril 2019

The Zagreb Municipal Criminal Court judgment thereby became final. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD001202710

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2014

10 juillet 2014

    On 28 June 2006 the Požega County Court ( Županijski sud u Požegi ) dismissed an appeal by the applicant and upheld the first-instance judgment, which thereby became final. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD002837005

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

After his arrest the applicant was admitted to hospital because he had frostbite on his feet.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0419JUD001194611

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2018

19 avril 2018

    As regards the exact date the offence became time-barred, the applicant initially submitted that the offence became time-barred on 4   September 2010.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0605JUD003376105

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2014

5 juin 2014

    On 7 September 2005 the District Court discontinued the case against the applicant on charges of drug trafficking, because the prosecutor had dropped the charges. 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206JUD000709710

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

No appeal was lodged within the ten-day statutory limitation period, and the judgment became final and enforceable. 21 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD006176708

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

    The case was adjourned on 14 December and 18 January 2010 because two co-defendants were sick. 40 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0124JUD004351415

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2019

24 janvier 2019

While the information stored was personal information because it related to individuals, it was in no sense intimate or sensitive information.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD002915709

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2011

26 juillet 2011

On 22   March 2005 the head of the Federal Migration Service confirmed the decision and it became enforceable. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0530JUD000797310

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2013

30 mai 2013

    The Court notes that the copy of this document, Appendix 8 to the observations of the Government, was incomplete because it was missing certain pages.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0730JUD003967803

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 2015

30 juillet 2015

The court examined the applicant’s request to summon the Committee as a respondent and rejected it because the proceedings in question had not concerned the Committee in any way.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD005217810

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2012

3 juillet 2012

His father also needed his support because of his age. 25.     On 18 November 2008 the Board refused to extend the applicant’s residence and work permit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0710JUD002669595

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1998

10 juillet 1998

Polybius describes Macedonia as a ‘shield’ and praises the Macedonians because they fought the barbarians (non-Greeks) to ensure the safety of the (other) Greeks (Polybius, Historiae , Leipzig edition,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1105JUD003558908

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2015

5 novembre 2015

    On an unspecified date, the applicant became aware that the evidence extracted from the body of his son had been lost. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC007387411

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2013

18 juin 2013

He had had leave to remain in Italy on humanitarian grounds, but had returned his ID card to the authorities because he wanted full asylum status.

Source officielle