His wife entered Switzerland on 23 August 1992.   Their daughter G. was born on 18 June 1993.

The applicant and her wife started exercising joint and indivisible parental authority over their daughter, in accordance with the Swiss family law. 6.

        The applicant further alleged a breach of Article 8 of the Convention in that proceedings instituted against him and his wife always resulted in wide press coverage

After marrying his wife, a Dutch and Moroccan national, the applicant entered the Netherlands in January 2001 where he was issued with a residence permit for the purpose of residing with his spouse.

As to the proportionality of the voting ban, 48,000 prisoners barred from voting was a significant figure which included a wide range of offenders and sentences, from one day to lifeand from relatively

It appears that since then the applicant has maintained contact with his wife as a regular visitor to Kalocsa Prison.

In an interim decision, the District Court granted the applicant and his former wife joint custody and gave the applicant right of contact with his daughter.

On 2 October 2017 the applicant’s wife and two daughters informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 21 December 2013, expressing their wish that the applicant’s younger daughter, Ms Irina Piloyan

In July 1998 the applicant’s wife filed a request for an entry visa on his behalf with the Dutch authorities.

His wife came to Latvia in 1969 and their daughter was born there. Following the break-up of the Soviet Union and the restoration of Latvia’s independence in 1991, the applicants became stateless.

  The applicant had a residence permit for the Netherlands which enabled him to live there with his wife. A son was born to the applicant and his wife on 27 August 1990.

    THE LAW   The applicant complains under Article 2 of the Convention about the failure of the United Kingdom authorities to conduct a proper inquiry into the death of his wife and to

against Romania lodged on 1 st November 2022 communicated on 4 March 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns criminal proceedings initiated by the applicant against B.V., his father’s wife

COUR D'APPEL DE DOUAI Chambre des Libertés Individuelles N° RG 25/01158 - N° Portalis DBVT-V-B7J-WIZN N° de Minute : 1168 Ordonnance du mercredi 02 juillet 2025 République Française

    In 2008 the applicant’s wife instituted divorce proceedings.

According to the documents submitted by the applicant, his wife had brought divorce civil proceedings against him.

  Summary of the facts   The applicant had a residence permit for the Netherlands which enabled him to live there with his wife.

The authorities also had wide discretion to decide which communications from those physically captured should be listened to or read.

    THE LAW   The applicant complains under Article 2 of the Convention about the failure of the United Kingdom authorities to conduct a proper inquiry into the death of his wife and to

The applicant's wife was granted a temporary residence permit for the purposes of asylum on 22 November 2001.