Relying on Article   6   §§   1 and   3   (c) (right to a fair trial), Mr Panovits makes a number of complaints about the unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him.

Lithuania (no. 26892/05) The applicants, Valentinas Aleksa, Laima Sofija Igarienė and Diana Petrauskienė, are Lithuanian nationals who were born in 1951, 1938 and 1968 respectively and live in Kaunas (

R. made no written requests for medical assistance. ...

it had been incumbent on the applicants to raise the complaints under Article   5 of the Convention in course of the administrative proceedings), the applicants cannot be reproached for having made

  33834/03, § 63, 11 July 2006; and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §   131, ECHR 2014). 49 .

, the German, the Austrian, the French, the Italian, the Spanish, the British, the Belgian, the Finnish, the Greek and the Liechtenstein Governments did not make use of their right to intervene in the

    The applicant did not make any submissions in this respect. 53.

This made him particularly vulnerable, especially given his age. 48.

Indeed, the prosecuting authorities made no mention of those considerations in their decisions.

The order was made within the framework of the Euromaidan case (see paragraph 6 above) on the basis of evidence indicating that a judge who, in 2013, had ordered the dismantling of barricades in central

  No thorough assessment was made by the courts of risks that the applicant faced in Tajikistan in light of criminal charges pending against him there.

The Court however notes from the material of the case file that no attempt was made to carry out investigation into the applicant’s alleged abduction. 9.

    The Court therefore concludes that the applicant has not made out an arguable claim in the above respects.

des opérations de banque à titre habituel alors qu'il n'était pas un établissement de crédit ; "aux motifs qu'il a reçu des fonds des emprunteurs sur un compte unique, qu'il les a utilisés comme une masse

It does not appear from the material before the Court, and it was not suggested by the parties, that those judgments were made any more public by the appellate courts which upheld them.

    The Court observes in this connection that the Government made no comment regarding the alleged handcuffing of the first applicant and the use of leash during the trip to the hospital on

    The first applicant, Mrs Valentina Nikolaeva Bevacqua, is a Bulgarian national who was born in 1974 and at the relevant time lived in Sofia. In 2003 or 2004 she moved to Italy.

  Romania (no. 2) , no. 71525/01, §§ 106-111, 26 April 2007; and Valentino Acatrinei v. Romania , no. 18540/04, §§ 66-77, 25 June 2013).

Yakovlevna Kulikova on 12 May 2005, Mr Anatoliy Veniaminovich Bolsunovskiy on 3   June 2005 and Ms Valentina Vasilyevna Zaretskaya on 2 September 2005 (“the applicants”). 2.