CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD007106412
17 décembre 2020
Having deliberated in private on 19 November 2020, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: INTRODUCTION 1.
Page 44 sur 3453
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0620JUD000882620
20 juin 2024
Detained, arrested and convicted persons shall be provided with the facilities required for meetings and consultations with the lawyer in private and confidentiality. ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0903JUD002451419
3 septembre 2024
On 18 December 2018 the Constitutional Court declared the applicant’s complaints under the right to respect for his private and family life inadmissible for being manifestly ill-founded on
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0914JUD004164319
14 septembre 2021
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905JUD004481020
5 septembre 2023
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1024JUD005556919
24 octobre 2023
interest expressed by the applicant in pursuing the application; the decision to dismiss the Government’s objection to the examination of the application by a Committee; Having deliberated in private
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119JUD001926705
19 novembre 2013
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life)
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3552
15 mai 2012
Spain - 56030/07 Judgment 15.5.2012 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Refusal to renew teacher of Catholic religion and morals’ contract after he publicly revealed his position
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0615JUD002197908
15 juin 2017
ECLI:CEDH:002-11132
21 juin 2016
Malta - 76136/12 Judgment 21.6.2016 [Section IV] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Withdrawal of citizenship following annulment of simulated marriage: no violation Facts – The applicant,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD007613612
It had interfered with his right to respect for his private and family life and exposed him to the risk of being separated from his family.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0730JUD002767195
30 juillet 1998
On 17 June 1986 the applicant requested the judge to order the monitoring of the applicant’s own telephone line; that measure proved fruitless.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD007477917
1 décembre 2022
The applicants complained that the interception of their telephone conversations in the course of the criminal proceedings against them had violated their right to respect for their private
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1026JUD001859319
26 octobre 2023
SLOVAKIA (Application no. 18593/19) JUDGMENT Art 8 • Private life • Correspondence • Court warrant authorising tapping of telephone conversations to which the applicant was randomly a party
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD002535812
24 janvier 2017
Private International Law Act 57. Under section 33 of the Private International Law Act 1995 (Law no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1121JUD001688203
21 novembre 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1221JUD006981011
21 décembre 2021
RUSSIA (Application no. 69810/11) JUDGMENT Art 8 • Home and private life • Unlawful and unjustified search of applicant’s home in connection with drug-related criminal investigation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0716JUD000014204
16 juillet 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD000917221
14 janvier 2025
Jadrijević Mladar; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 3 December 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905JUD003143421
DENMARK (Application no. 31434/21) JUDGMENT Art 8 • Expulsion • Private life • Disproportionate expulsion of settled migrant combined with twelve-year re-entry ban following convictions