CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

69 049 résultats pour « Privel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD007106412

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2020

17 décembre 2020

Having deliberated in private on 19   November 2020, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: INTRODUCTION 1.

Page 44 sur 3453

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0620JUD000882620

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2024

20 juin 2024

Detained, arrested and convicted persons shall be provided with the facilities required for meetings and consultations with the lawyer in private and confidentiality. ...”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0903JUD002451419

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2024

3 septembre 2024

    On 18 December 2018 the Constitutional Court declared the applicant’s complaints under the right to respect for his private and family life inadmissible for being manifestly ill-founded on

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0914JUD004164319

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2021

14 septembre 2021

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905JUD004481020

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2023

5 septembre 2023

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1024JUD005556919

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2023

24 octobre 2023

interest expressed by the applicant in pursuing the application; the decision to dismiss the Government’s objection to the examination of the application by a Committee;   Having deliberated in private

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119JUD001926705

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2013

19 novembre 2013

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3552

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2012

15 mai 2012

Spain - 56030/07 Judgment 15.5.2012 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Refusal to renew teacher of Catholic religion and morals’ contract after he publicly revealed his position

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0615JUD002197908

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2017

15 juin 2017

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11132

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2016

21 juin 2016

Malta - 76136/12 Judgment 21.6.2016 [Section IV] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Withdrawal of citizenship following annulment of simulated marriage: no violation Facts – The applicant,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD007613612

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2016

21 juin 2016

It had interfered with his right to respect for his private and family life and exposed him to the risk of being separated from his family.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0730JUD002767195

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 1998

30 juillet 1998

On 17 June 1986 the applicant requested the judge to order the monitoring of the applicant’s own telephone line; that measure proved fruitless.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD007477917

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2022

1 décembre 2022

    The applicants complained that the interception of their telephone conversations in the course of the criminal proceedings against them had violated their right to respect for their private

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1026JUD001859319

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2023

26 octobre 2023

SLOVAKIA (Application no. 18593/19)   JUDGMENT   Art 8 • Private life • Correspondence • Court warrant authorising tapping of telephone conversations to which the applicant was randomly a party

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD002535812

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2017

24 janvier 2017

    Private International Law Act 57.     Under section 33 of the Private International Law Act 1995 (Law   no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1121JUD001688203

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2013

21 novembre 2013

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1221JUD006981011

Admin. suprême

21 décembre 2021

21 décembre 2021

RUSSIA (Application no. 69810/11)     JUDGMENT   Art 8 • Home and private life • Unlawful and unjustified search of applicant’s home in connection with drug-related criminal investigation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0716JUD000014204

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2013

16 juillet 2013

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD000917221

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2025

14 janvier 2025

Jadrijević Mladar; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 3 December 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905JUD003143421

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2023

5 septembre 2023

DENMARK (Application no. 31434/21)     JUDGMENT   Art 8 • Expulsion • Private life • Disproportionate expulsion of settled migrant combined with twelve-year re-entry ban following convictions

Source officielle