CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0924DEC004214005
24 septembre 2019
(v) Attempts to set in motion a supervision procedure 30 .
Page 44 sur 351
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD007146301
9 avril 2009
On 31 January 1996 the Maribor Higher Court granted their motion for a change of venue. 23.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628JUD007146301
28 juin 2007
On 31 January 1996 the Maribor Higher Court granted their motion for a change of venue. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0511DEC003364296
11 mai 1999
The motion shall be accompanied by the decision concerned, certified as to its being executory. The motion is submitted to the bailiff who carries out the enforcement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0521JUD006276514
21 mai 2026
It was the first time that a President of the Republic had declined to appoint candidates indicated in the motion of the NCJ. III.
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:C210478
28 juin 2018
des lieux ou d'une expulsion à l'égard de la partie adverse se prévalant de cette irrégularité dès lors que l'appelant n'a pas notifié à celle-ci son adresse actuelle ; que la cour rappelle que les montions
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0723JUD004999414
23 juillet 2015
On 14 March 2014 the applicant lodged a motion for a deadline with the Ljubljana Higher Court. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD004428612
20 juillet 2017
On an unspecified date the applicant filed a motion with the Regional Court seeking to be released.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD003576006
18 mars 2008
On 16 August 2002 the Czarna District Office received another motion for instituting demarcation proceedings involving the applicant’s land.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113DEC003111902
13 novembre 2007
been fined for “lodging in bad faith a motion for disqualifying a judge”.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10903
23 mars 2016
from a wide number of sources, the obligations incumbent on the States under Articles 2 and 3 in expulsion cases entailed that the authorities carry out an assessment of that risk of their own motion
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115503
27 novembre 2012
The applicant submitted before the court that the motion had to be dismissed since the investigating authority had not mentioned any proper grounds for considering that he might abscond or commit other
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915DEC004627107
15 septembre 2009
On 16 September 2002 Przemyśl Regional Court refused the applicant’s motion to have the proceedings resumed and dismissed his request to protect the claim by means of interim measures.
ECLI:CEDH:001-145740
25 juin 2014
Others may only file a “motion” proposing ( mogu podneti inicijativu ) that such proceedings be instituted by the Constitutional Court, but cannot bring a case directly and in their own right.
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:SO00826
30 septembre 2020
____________________ ARRÊT DE LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, DU 30 SEPTEMBRE 2020 1°/ La société [...] , société par actions simplifiée, dont le siège est [...] , 2°/ la société Garrett Motion
10ème / 9ème SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000029177093
, sous le n° 347923, la requête sommaire et le mémoire complémentaire, enregistrés les 28 mars et 22 avril 2011 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentés par la société Research in motion
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304DEC005051199
4 mars 2003
On 2 May 1990 F.S. lodged a motion with the court, claiming physical division of the estate, which comprised certain plots of land in the municipality of Izabelin.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0311DEC001566504
11 mars 2008
The applicant’s motion to re-open the case was to no avail.
ECLI:CEDH:001-156303
22 juin 2015
On 11 October 2004 the District Court rejected the applicant’s motion.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0704DEC004229798
4 juillet 2002
On 7 June 2002 the Supreme Court rejected that motion. B.