A compter du 1er mars 2020, le marché a été repris par la société Détection Gardiennage Sécurité Intervention (DGSI).

Dollé , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 14 March 2006, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Further hearings were held on 28 January, 11 March and 15 April 1997.

N° P 15-81.699 F-D N° 252 ND 2 MARS 2016 CASSATION PARTIELLE M.

    On 13 March 2009 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government.

HUNGARY   (Application no. 41453/05)               JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   24 March 2009   FINAL   24/06/2009   This judgment

On 6 March 2002 the Supreme Court acquitted them of the charge of tax fraud and upheld the remainder of the second-instance judgment in their respect. 12.

Les parties sont âgées respectivement de 59 ans pour l'épouse et de 61 ans pour le mari. Le couple a eu trois enfants.

CIV.3 LG COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 30 mars 2017 Cassation M.

X... la somme de 2 500 euros ; Dit que sur les diligences du procureur général près la Cour de cassation, le présent arrêt sera transmis pour être transcrit en marge ou à la suite de l'arrêt cassé ;

  34148/07, §   52, 31 March 2016). (b)    In accordance with the law 44.

    On 30 March 2009 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government.

    On 19 March 2004 the case was stayed because one of the plaintiffs died. On 27 September 2004 the second and third applicants joined the proceedings as successors of the deceased party.

The process lasted 16 years and three months, from 31 December 1983 until 31 March 2000.

Previously, in January and March 2010, some of the Transport Company’s senior officials together with a close colleague of the applicant had already been suspected in the same context.

(“the applicant”), on 30 March 2011. The President of the Section acceded to the applicant’s request not to have his name disclosed (Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court). 2.

This decision was quashed on appeal by the Pest County Regional Court on 12   March 2002. 6.

(“the applicant”), on 17 March 2011. The President of the Section acceded to the applicant’s request not to have his name disclosed (Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court). 2.

under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Hungarian nationals, Mr Gábor Medgyes and Mr János Rusz (“the applicants”), on 21 March