On 2 June 1999 the applicants brought separate actions for compensation against the Municipality before the Diyarbakır Labour Court. 8.

Court, E: 1999/323 K: 1999/509     15/06/1999 Diyarbakır Labour Court, E: 1999/350 K: 1999/385     17/11/1999 Diyarbakır Labour Court, E: 1999/321 K: 1999/357 31/12/1999    

At the time of the events giving rise to the present applications they had succeeded in an exam to advance to the post of labour auditor.

applicant had failed to bring her case within a time-limit of 15 days after having received the notice of her dismissal before the Hungarian Labour Arbitration Commission.

    On 21 April 2015 the Tomar Labour Court dismissed the claim, ruling that it did not have jurisdiction to assess the matter, because it did not fall under labour law. 8.

They challenged the decisions before the Budapest Administrative and Labour Court, which again quashed them. 10 .

CHARTRES N° Chambre : N° Section : N° RG : 12/02555 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions Copies délivrées le : à : Me Valérie LEGAL, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES Me Claire CORBILLE LALOUE

Court and the Brandenburg Regional Labour Court.

The obligation consequently amounts to forced or compulsory labour.

An appeal may be filed against the decision of the court hearing the labour case within five days of its notification.

Mr De. was sentenced to five months of correctional labour which represented a five percent deduction from Mr   De.’s salary to be paid to the State.

She unsuccessfully challenged her dismissal before the labour courts. Her constitutional complaint was likewise dismissed.

social est sis 36 quai Fulchiron - 69005 LYON représentée par Mme [D] [Z] (Chargée de recouvrement) muni d’un pouvoir spécial d’une part, DEFENDEURS Monsieur [H] [N], demeurant 160 rue Challemel Lacour

L'expert a déposé diverses notes d'expertise puis un rapport d'expertise général le 7 juin 2001 et un rapport définitif concernant l'immeuble du 24-26 rue Latour le 10 août 2003.

On the basis of a report drawn up by labour inspectors on the nature of Tukaş’s activities and its labour force, the Ministry found that, in view of the number of employees belonging to the applicant union

The appeal had no suspensive effect, hence both applicants were transferred to the Labour and Social Security Division on 22 August 2022. 15.

débats que l'arrêt sera prononcé, par sa mise à disposition au greffe le 1er septembre 2022 ; Il a été rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la Cour, composée de : Président :Alain LACOUR

COUR D'APPEL D'ORLÉANS CHAMBRE CIVILE - TRIBUNAL PARITAIRE DES BAUX RURAUX EXPÉDITIONS le : 03/10/2022 COPIES aux PARTIES [K] [D] [L] [H] la SCP POISSON & CORBILLÉ-LALOUE Me Emmeline

X] [B] [G] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représentant : Me Alain ANTOINE, avocat au barreau de SAINT-DENIS-DE-LA-REUNION INTIME ORDONNANCE SUR INCIDENT N° DU 04 Octobre 2022 Nous, Alain Lacour

] [L] [Adresse 1], [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] (REUNION) Représentant : Mme Julie PADRE, défenseur syndical ouvrier INTIMEE ORDONNANCE SUR INCIDENT N° du 04 octobre 2022 Nous, Alain Lacour