Facts – The applicants were awarded different sums in respect of unpaid work-related benefits.

The court found that the applicant had been held in overcrowded cells for most of the time of his detention.

The governor lashed out: “To hell with numbers! If I had cared about numbers, I would have hanged myself [on the day of my appointment]. Like hell! You won’t see me hanging myself! ...

Failure to obtain such help could lead to the patient’s death. 3.

It considered that the applicant's two adult children could help his wife, who was ill.

(P4-2);   Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 14 March 1985;   Whereas in its judgment of 18 December 1986 the Court inter alia unanimously:   - held

was brought before the Court by the Commission on 13 December 1991;        Whereas in its judgment of 25 February 1993 the Court, inter alia:        - held

The Court had held a preparatory meeting beforehand.   There appeared before the Court: (a)   for the Government Mr   J.

there had been no breach of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (P4-2) to the Convention as regards the measure taken in New Caledonia;        - held by five votes to four that there

Par ordonnance du 8 novembre 2024, le juge des référés du tribunal judiciaire d'Avesnes sur Helpe a désigné M. [G] en qualité d'expert.

1988 and by the Government of Sweden on 8 November 1988;           Whereas in its judgment of 22 June 1989 the Court:         - held

The hearing before the court was held on 4 October 1989. 10.

The court held two more hearings – on 31 March and 15 May 2006. 12.

It held that the lower courts had committed serious errors of fact and law. 14.

Ruling on an equitable basis, it awards her EUR   2,500 under that head. B.     Costs and expenses 41.

Further hearings were held on 10 March 2000, on 10 and 24   May 2000 as well as on 21 June 2000. 41.

The Court accordingly held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3.

The court held the first hearing on 21 November 1990. Further hearings were held on 16 and 28 January 1991.

  Sum awarded on equitable basis, in respect of all heads of damage taken together. Conclusion : respondent State to pay applicants specified sum (six votes to three). B.