The Court stated :   “Further, whether the jury could on the indictment have found the defendant guilty of some other offence, turns upon s.6 of the Criminal Law Act 1967....

    V.K., who had his own defence lawyer during the trial, pleaded not guilty. 23 .

  (2) Where evidence is adduced proving a person’s guilt, the accused or the person charged with a criminal offence has the right to rebut the evidence.” 35.

The applicant pleaded not guilty.

The failure retrospectively to declare the applicant innocent could not be equated with an implied or express suspicion of guilt. 36.

of an offence before his guilt has been established by a court (see Allenet de Ribemont , cited above, §§ 35-36).

On 14 April 2003 the District Court found the applicants guilty. Amongst other items of evidence, it relied on the testimony of L.C. and T.M.

He pleaded "not guilty".     The trial took place in December 1993. The applicant admitted that his voice was one of those recorded on the tape.

The applicant further complains that, when finding him guilty, the courts had failed to properly examine the evidence obtained as a result of the criminal conduct simulation model, which had been unlawfully

day it had discontinued the proceedings in respect of a number of further charges of sexual coercion in view of the penalty the applicant had to expect for the four offences he was subsequently found guilty

On 19 July 2007, in the misdemeanour proceedings, the applicant was found guilty of possession of undeclared goods (i.e. 4,689 boxes of cigarettes without import stamps) after having been stopped by the

The applicant argues that according to the domestic law the termination of criminal proceedings due to its excessive length is only possible if he pleads guilty.

Un mémoire présenté pour la requérante, par Me Guillier, a été enregistré le 18 novembre 2025. Il n’a pas été communiqué. Vu les autres pièces des dossiers.

Un mémoire présenté pour la requérante, par Me Guillier, a été enregistré le 18 novembre 2025. Il n’a pas été communiqué. Vu les autres pièces des dossiers.

On 17 December 1999 the Vranje District Court found him guilty as charged and sentenced him to one year of imprisonment. 22.

  He or she cannot be forced to make statements or to      plead guilty."   (Original)        "1.

  He or she cannot be forced to make statements or to      plead guilty."   (Original)        "1.

Accordingly it had not been proven that he was guilty of the charges brought against him.

before his guilt has been proved according to law.