a remote colony     64106/19 22/11/2019 Roman Leonidovich CHERNYSHEV 1988     IK-6 Khabarovsk Region The applicant is a detainee, his relatives are: mother, wife, child, father, brother

He expressed doubts about the way his brother had died. 18.     On 14 November 2003 a gendarmerie officer took a statement from the applicant concerning the incident.

Three of the permits were, contrary to a request made by the Saami village, granted to the brothers S.

The application was lodged on his behalf and on behalf of his brother Ahmet Çakıcı.

l'appel interjeté par Mme [Z] [I] d'un jugement rendu par le conseil de prud'hommes - formation paritaire de Nanterre en date du 1er février 2024dans un litige l'opposant à la Société les Laboratoires Brothier

His brother, Mr Zaur Japaridze, informed the Court that he wished to pursue the application on behalf of his brother. [2] 3.

the Convention found by the Court in this case concerns the absence of an effective remedy whereby the applicant might seek compensation for non-pecuniary damage following the lawful killing of her brother

Brossier, vice-président, en application de l'article R. 222-13 du code de justice administrative.

On the day of the incident, his brother was living in Aytepe.

However, having traced him, the authorities had observed that the child wished to remain living with his father and his brother and that he felt more secure with them.

The record noted that Ms B “is intoxicated and admits to being an alcoholic” and that “[t]he accommodation is squalid with evidence that [the applicant] and [his younger brother] have been eating from

BROSSIER, Président, M. ATTAS, M. DAUMONT, Juges, assistés de Mme Blandine MENNITI, Greffier-Audiencier.

GUESSENND’S BROTHERS [Adresse 7] [Localité 8] représentées par Maître Guillaume AKSIL de la SCP LINCOLN AVOCATS CONSEIL, avocats au barreau de PARIS - #P0293 DEFENDERESSES Société BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY

Brossier et les observations de Me Dion substituant Me Gilbert, pour Mme A.... Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

Rees, président, Mme Brodier, première conseillère, Mme Poittevin, conseillère. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 15 avril 2026. La rapporteure, H.

Brossier. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Le rapport de Mme Brodier a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique.

Brossier et les observations de Me Pitiot, avocat, pour M. et Mme B.... Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M. A...