She alleged that on 29 June 2002 the applicant had demolished a separating wall erected between their backyards by her husband and broken one of the windows of her house.

Greece, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Kristina Pardalos, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,  

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Aleš Pejchal,   Krzysztof

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Nina Vajić,   Peer Lorenzen,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

sitting on 18 March 2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

the hand grenade did not belong to him and that it had been “planted” in his wife’s flat by the MNS officers who, having tricked his wife, had gained access to the flat about 30   minutes before she

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

In particular, she had failed to disclose to the Court that by a final judgment of 24 October 2018 the Bucharest Court of Appeal had ordered the Bucharest mayor’s office to issue an administrative decision

She is detained in Gebze Prison (Turkey).   On 17 September 1993 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of being a member of Dev-Sol (Revolutionary Left), and was taken into custody.

  In the case of Alexandru-Radu Luca v.

Rosa Rodrigues Casal was not a party to the proceedings and was therefore not a victim of the alleged violation, as she had not declared her claims at the stage of the proceedings when she was supposed

She met the applicant there and followed his case throughout his stay in prison. 45.

Since there was no sign or inscription prohibiting the taking of pictures, and the event took place outside the checkpoint, the applicants told C. that she could do so.

#xa0;   It follows that the domestic courts have concluded that the first applicant was no longer entitled to either compensation or restitutio in integrum of the immovable property in so far as she

) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Moldovan national, Mr Alexandru

xa0; In the case of Hammerton v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Linos-Alexandre

She stated, inter alia , that: “... the changes in blood pressure and blood sugar levels had no effect on the defendant’s ability to understand his actions.

The applicant’s wife informed the applicant that she would not be able to visit him in prison because their daughter was unwell.