After failing to reach a friendly settlement, by letters of different dates set out in the appendix, the respondent Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with

The Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints.

application (no. 716/05) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Ukrainian national, Ms Valentina

    Lastly, according to the latest available information, the court decision on demolition of the church has not been executed and the applicant is still able to make use of the building (for

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

After the failure of attempts to reach a friendly settlement, by a letter dated 6 July 2012 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving

    Those accusations were made against the President of Romania at the relevant time and against five senior army officers, including the then Minister of the Interior.

They include in particular the nature of the complaints made, the acknowledgment of a violation of the Convention and the undertaking to pay adequate compensation for such violation, the existence of clear

    The Government made no submissions on the merits of this complaint. The Court’s assessment 54.

    The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Valentin Ivanov v.

European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Anja Seibert-Fohr , President ,   Armen Harutyunyan,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins , judges , and Valentin

The upper and lower parts of the compartment doors were made of grating that allowed additional air circulation in the vehicle.

    The Court observes at the outset that the main facts, as submitted by the parties, concern the period 2001-2013 and also notes that the applicants have not informed it of any fact or made

The Constitutional Court noted that it was clear that the valuation made by the experts appointed by the tribunal was in stark contrast to the valuations made by the previous architects and the ex parte

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

It therefore sees no causal link between the violation found and most of the claims made.

The appeal shall be made in accordance with the rules established in the Code of Civil Procedure (Section 35). 33.

In describing the defendants’ general attitude, the prosecutor’s office reiterated the assessment made by the criminal investigation unit attached to the Romanian police (see paragraph 26 above). 3.