CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD003558215
1 mars 2022
involves the possibility for an individual to refuse publication of the image, it also covers the individual’s right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction of the image (see López Ribalda
Page 43 sur 44
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0109JUD003013821
9 janvier 2024
Ricardo Bragança de Matos, Attorney General. 4. The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. 5 . The applicant was born in 1975 and lives in Évora.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1031JUD000960218
31 octobre 2023
to refuse publication of his or her image, it also covers the individual’s right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction of the image by another person (see, for instance , López Ribalda
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0413JUD001470907
13 avril 2023
recognises that Ms Myroslava Korostelova may have a sufficient interest in continuing the proceedings and can act in her mother’s stead in the present case (see, among other similar examples, López Ribalda
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0320JUD001557689
20 mars 1991
One from Nicolas Reyes Armijo, President of the Cultural Centre for Freedom in Belloto, one from Ricardo Poblete Muñoz, co-ordinator in the organisation of neighbourhood committees, as well as a certificate
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0319DEC001022109
19 mars 2015
1960 Celone Anna Maria CALISI 10/11/1959 Avezzano Nadia ORREA [24] 31/03/1965 Massa D’Alba Ferdinando Emilio ABBATE 33590/10 07/04/2010 Riccardo
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0107JUD001873718
7 janvier 2025
Ricardo Bragança de Matos, Public Prosecutor. 4. The first applicant lodged the application on his own behalf and on behalf of his son, the second applicant, who is a minor. 5.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1027DEC001890291
27 octobre 1998
Di ogni deposito deve essere dato avviso senza ritardo al difensore."
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD000920408
1 février 2022
10764/09, § 31, 27 May 2014, and López Ribalda and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 1874/13 and 8567/13, § 89, 17 October 2019). 79.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0902DEC004320919
2 septembre 2021
Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 61, ECHR 2015; and López Ribalda and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 1874/13 and 8567/13, § 149, 17 October 2019 ). 59.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD003598914
14 janvier 2020
4378/02, § 89, 10 March 2009; and López Ribalda and Others v. Spain , nos. 1874/13 and 8567/13, § 83, 9 January 2018) . 65 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0319JUD004723819
19 mars 2024
The Government were represented by their Agent, Ms M.F. da Graça Carvalho, Deputy Attorney General, and, after 1 September 2022, Mr Ricardo Bragança de Matos, Public Prosecutor. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD000779616
1 juillet 2021
in most cases it entails the possibility to refuse publication of the image, it also covers the individual’s right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction of the image (see López Ribalda
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0627JUD002709420
27 juin 2023
Accordingly, a person’s “private life” embraces multiple aspects of the person’s social identity (see López Ribalda and Others v. Spain [GC], nos.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1008JUD004804715
8 octobre 2024
Carvalho, Deputy Attorney General, and, from that date onwards, by their Agent, Mr Ricardo Bragança de Matos, Public Prosecutor. BACKGROUND 4 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0109JUD002176622
9 janvier 2025
dealing with civil cases, it may nevertheless draw inspiration, when examining the fairness of civil-law proceedings, from the principles developed under the criminal limb of Article 6 ” (see López Ribalda
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0620JUD003670516
20 juin 2023
for an individual to refuse publication of his or her image, it also covers the individual’s right to object to the recording, conservation and reproduction of the image by another person (see López Ribalda
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1127JUD004305022
27 novembre 2025
court of fourth instance and will not therefore question under Article 6 § 1 the national courts’ assessment, unless their findings can be regarded as arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable (see López Ribalda
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1125DEC005118520
25 novembre 2025
The Government were represented by their Agents, Mr Ricardo Bragança de Matos, and Mr Manuel Magriço Aires, Public Prosecutors. 4.
CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;OPINIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-7623141-11823148
There are different ways of ensuring respect for private life and the nature of the State’s obligation will depend on the particular aspect of private life that is at issue (see López Ribalda and Others