CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD008126012
16 juin 2015
T.K. stated that he had not participated in the fight, and had attempted to pull K.K. away. He had not seen who had started it. 10.
Page 43 sur 101
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212DEC000198802
12 décembre 2002
With regard to this last piece of information, the authority stated that it was a matter for individual conscience and was therefore not essential for the determination of identity.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207DEC000552708
7 décembre 2010
They saw Mr Bennett from their vehicle as he was walking away from them and up a pedestrian ramp to the flats. He matched the description they had been given.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004307106
26 juin 2012
The applicants stated that both pieces of legislation referred to by the Government did not apply in their case. 49.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-171225
17 janvier 2017
She only wrote a report, or to be precise, scribbled something on a piece of paper that was not signed by any of the commission members.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD003693108
10 juillet 2012
proceedings under the Extra-Judicial Rehabilitations Act 1991 was not capable of undermining the conclusion the Supreme Court had reached in the proceedings under consideration governed by a different piece
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914JUD004464617
14 septembre 2023
In the circumstances of the present case, the Court is sensitive to the applicant’s arguments, supported by pieces of evidence, that his conditions of stay in the red Cross Centre were far
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507DEC002184621
7 mai 2026
There had been no explanation why fast-food establishments selling take-away hot beverages had been exempted while traditional-style cafes had not.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1021JUD001675624
21 octobre 2025
The Court, having regard to the documents before it, awards the applicant EUR 5,400 in respect of pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1006JUD005246415
6 octobre 2020
The Government submitted that no award should be made to the applicant, discerning no interference with the applicant’s possessions. 67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0522JUD004166698
22 mai 2003
Making an assessment on an equitable basis, it decides to award the first applicant EUR 20,000 and the second applicant EUR 10,000 for the non-pecuniary damage sustained. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209JUD000504702
9 décembre 2008
Nevertheless, even a confession repeated in court cannot on its own be regarded as a decisive piece of evidence unless supported by additional evidence. THE LAW I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1124JUD003568811
24 novembre 2016
When interviewed, S.S., K.S.’s sister, stated that she had been aware of some problems between her brother and a friend of the applicant.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-644711-650342
5 novembre 2002
On 17 November 1989 she asked the Supreme Court of Cyprus to declare the decisions to take away part of her land and to use that piece of land for the construction of a public road, void and without
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0507JUD004804009
7 mai 2020
He had been aware that his brother had taken stolen goods to Kyiv, where he had proceeded to sell them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005147212
15 mars 2018
Having regard to Rule 60, the Court therefore makes no award under Article 41 of the Convention. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0424JUD002581912
24 avril 2025
The Government considered that in the absence of a violation no award was to be made. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0222JUD006621212
22 février 2022
The Court is not convinced that the District Court’s arguments supplied to justify the refusal to admit a key piece of evidence was adequate and sufficient.
ECLI:CEDH:001-118892
25 mars 2013
It held that the property in question had been taken away from the applicant’s predecessor before 25 February 1948 and therefore the restitution legislation did not apply.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1016JUD004830321
16 octobre 2025
The accused will also be asked whether he or she is aware of the consequences of his or her actions.