CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10011
19 février 1991
Costs and expenses before Convention organs: no claim – not a matter which Court has to examine of its own motion. Conclusion : respondent State to pay specified sum to the applicant (unanimously).
Page 43 sur 351
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68003-68471
30 novembre 1999
Rule 39 § 1 reads as follows: "The Chamber or, where appropriate, its President may, at the request of a party or of any other person concerned, or of its own motion, indicate to the parties
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222488
16 décembre 2022
the Convention that he was deprived of a fair hearing because after he had been acquitted at first instance, he was convicted by the appellate court without that court having itself, out of its own motion
comm
6079d6799ba5988459c5b4c0
7 mars 1972
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE, PRIS EN SES QUATRE BRANCHES : ATTENDU QUE, SELON LES ENONCIATIONS DE L'ARRET ATTAQUE (PARIS,14 MAI 1970) LA SOCIETE DAIEI MOTION PICTURE (LA DAIEI), DE TOKYO, PAR ACTE PASSE A PARIS
CHAMBRE DU CONSEIL
69b8a80ccdc6046d47ea6778
10 juillet 2025
des Sociétés de CLERMONT-FERRAND sous le numéro 913 645 917 et exploite une activité de production audiovisuelle, de création de contenus vidéo (publicité, vidéo event etc…), de montage de vidéo et motion
ECLI:CEDH:002-9690
24 août 1993
Costs and expenses: applicant had not sought reimbursement - Court did not have to consider issue of its own motion.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4386
27 mai 2004
of the Code of Civil Procedure, progress in proceedings depends entirely on the parties' diligence; if the latter abandon the proceedings temporarily or definitively, the courts cannot of their own motion
ECLI:CEDH:001-214200
18 novembre 2021
The court in the first case dismissed his motion to examine a police officer and two witnesses on behalf of the defence. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923DEC006390500
23 septembre 2003
On the same date, the same court examined a fresh motion by the prosecutor and again prolonged the applicant’s detention, until 31 December 1998.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517DEC002454494
17 mai 1995
This was so because by accepting the motion for aggravation of the accusation, the judges had in fact formed a preconceived opinion on the case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202DEC005246299
2 février 2006
She has further failed to lodge a motion for the proceedings to be resumed.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1115JUD005472700
15 novembre 2001
The most recent such motion was filed by the applicant on 7 May 1996 requesting the removal of the presiding judge.
JUGE UNIQUE Y CROSNIER
DTA_2201305_20241112
12 novembre 2024
Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 22 juin 2023, le syndicat mixte du conservatoire départemental Emile Goué, représenté par Me Monpion, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce qu'une somme de 2 000
Cour administrative d'appel de Bordeaux
DCA_21BX04053_20220517
17 mai 2022
Procédure devant la cour : Par une requête enregistrée le 27 octobre 2021, M. et Mme B, représentés par Me Monpion, demandent à la cour : 1°) d'annuler l'ordonnance n° 2100885 du 14 octobre 2021 rendue
1ère chambre
DTA_2300264_20241126
26 novembre 2024
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 21 février 2023, Mme A C, représentée par Me Monpion, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision du 21 décembre 2022 par laquelle le directeur
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118DEC002551206
18 janvier 2011
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the change of the ground for his dismissal by the Court of Appeal of its own motion.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0920DEC004032498
20 septembre 2001
His repeated further motions of 5 May, 7, 16 and 23 June 1994 were to no avail. He filed further motions on 4 and 24 October 1994.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0715JUD002527006
15 juillet 2010
On 18 January 2001 the court granted the applicant's motion to identify a co-respondent and adjourned the hearing. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD006623210
27 janvier 2015
It dismissed the applicant’s argument that the disciplinary measure had infringed his procedural right, exercised in his capacity as defence counsel, to lodge a motion for bias.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0527JUD004934999
27 mai 2003
The petitioner maintained her motion for acquisitive prescription, the party K.K. joined that motion and the court heard four witnesses and adjourned the hearing until 15 July 1997. 59.