Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention

Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

    The applicant complained that she had been deprived of her liberty from 11 July to 20 September 2012 without judicial authorisation.

Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

It has held that the practice of keeping defendants in detention without a specific legal basis or clear rules governing their situation – with the result that they may be deprived of their liberty for

Its key purpose is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivations of liberty (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, § 84, ECHR   2016 (extracts), with further references). 8

S. 3 et seq . of the Act concern “measures without deprivation of liberty”.

On 4 October 2024, the applicants lodged objections against their deprivation of liberty with the first-instance Administrative Court of Syros.

He also complains that he was deprived of his liberty without any justification or individualised assessment of his circumstances, and that the first official decision to deprive him of his liberty was

IRRECEVABILITE D'APPEL Grosse délivrée le : aux avocats Décision déférée à la Cour : jugement rendu le 07 avril 2020 (R.G. 2020000400) par le Tribunal de Commerce de LIBOURNE

l'audiovisuel en date du 18 mars 1997 rejetant la demande d'autorisation d'exploiter un service de radiodiffusion sonore dénommé Skyrock sur les zones d'Angoulême, Cognac, Saintes, Rochefort, Sarlat, Libourne

) (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-f - Extradition;Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review

No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that his deprivation of liberty from 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. on 16 July 2003 had been unlawful, as had his subsequent placement in pre-trial detention.

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

While it could not be concluded that the applicant had been deprived of his liberty on that basis alone, there were other significant factors pointing to the existence of a deprivation of liberty, at least

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...