CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0429JUD004170798
29 avril 2003
On the day of the Delegates’ visit to Khmelnitskiy Prison, he was held in a single cell. 24.
Page 43 sur 1190
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0910JUD003728313
10 septembre 2019
She claimed that she and X could live together at her parents’ house, arguing that her mother stayed at home and was willing to help care for X and that she and her mother were also willing to accept help
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184365
7 juin 2018
It further held that the requirement to meet the child only in the presence of her mother was not in line with family legislation and was against the interests of the child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0512JUD003501703
12 mai 2009
Ruling on an equitable basis, it awards her EUR 2,000 under that head. B. Costs and expenses 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1207JUD001250409
7 décembre 2017
Judging on an equitable basis, it awards him EUR 1,500 under this head. B. Costs and expenses 68.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD006674201
24 novembre 2005
The Government did not submit any specific observations under this head. 25.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0127DEC006210800
27 janvier 2004
The court held hearings on 21 July and 10 October 1994. At the hearing held on 27 June 1995 the court heard evidence form the parties.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0623JUD004472298
23 juin 2005
On 29 December 1997 the trial court held a hearing and heard several witnesses.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68401-68869
5 juillet 2001
A public hearing in the case was held on 8 February 2001.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915DEC006631911
15 septembre 2020
In addition, the Government submitted that Article 6 was not applicable under its civil head either.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD000100916
28 novembre 2017
In sum, the Court has established above that from 4 November 2013 until 7 January 2014 the applicant was held in an ordinary police detention facility, that he was not afforded adequate sleeping
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55869
24 juillet 2000
in respect of any of the remaining six applicants; - held, unanimously, that Article 5, paragraph 5, of the Convention was not applicable; - held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0713JUD003776197
13 juillet 2004
At the hearing held on 18 September 1997 the court heard evidence from an expert. Further hearings were held on 2 October and 24 November 1997. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0225JUD007774601
25 février 2003
The court held hearings on 30 May, 10 July and 17 October 1997. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016JUD000132604
16 octobre 2007
In this respect, the Court observes that the applicant was held in custody for 4 years and 9 days. 58.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0317JUD000204012
17 mars 2015
At the same time the applicant Ionuţ Ludovic Chinez was hit on the head by an unknown person and lost consciousness.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205JUD002087507
5 février 2013
The three of them had wounds to their heads and bruises on their backs and arms.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2366288-2537510
29 mai 2008
The applicants were held at gun point in their room while the servicemen conducted a thorough search of the premises which took about one hour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0511DEC001771609
11 mai 2010
[Mr Zegan's] head injury occurred as a consequence of his being hit with or hitting himself against a blunt object with a large, flat surface, for example, as a result of his falling and hitting his head
ECLI:CEDH:003-2401768-2598089
26 juin 2008
Accordingly, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 2 in respect of Apti Isigov and Zelimkhan Umkhanov.