CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

13 830 résultats pour « Guilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2123497-2252835

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2007

20 septembre 2007

He also pleaded not guilty.   Riga Regional Court found the applicant guilty under Article 68-3 and imposed an immediate six-year custodial sentence.

Source officielle
CC

comm

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2012:CO00879

Cassation

18 septembre 2012

18 septembre 2012

-A..., la société Guilde immobilière européenne (les débiteurs) ont été mis en redressement puis liquidation judiciaires, M. d'Y...étant désigné liquidateur de la procédure unique ; que la caisse régionale

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229883

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2023

30 novembre 2023

In the third set of the proceedings the applicant was found guilty of the failure to comply with the police officer’s lawful order and sentenced to 15 days’ administrative arrest,   Art. 6 (1) - and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0708JUD000981582

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1986

8 juillet 1986

In the author’s opinion, by sheltering behind the philosophic alternative between collective guilt and collective innocence the Austrians had avoided facing up to a real, discernible and assessable guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304DEC003723597

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2003

4 mars 2003

Since his guilt could not be established, his evidence also had to be regarded as unreliable in so far as it concerned acts allegedly committed by the applicants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD000181411

Admin. suprême

18 février 2020

18 février 2020

    The court held further that, since the applicant was guilty of a single act of forgery, the legal classification of her offence had to be changed from continuous acts of forgery to a single

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010DEC006319609

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2017

10 octobre 2017

After examining the applicants’ claims in the light of the available evidence, the court held that the lower courts had correctly established the applicants’   guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602JUD005414510

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2015

2 juin 2015

Everyone charged with criminal conduct shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty.” 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003419996

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 1998

9 septembre 1998

    On 18 March 1996 the applicant was found guilty of disobeying an order to go to the MDT room to provide a urine sample as part of the random drug testing programme.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003844097

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1998

1 juillet 1998

  The jury was unable to agree on the third count in relation to Mr G. and the judge entered a not guilty verdict, it being inappropriate to hold a third trial on that issue.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1215DEC002495294

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 1998

15 décembre 1998

xa0;   On 16 October 1993 the Public Prosecutor attached to the Brindisi District Court requested that the applicant be remanded in custody, on grounds that there was a serious indication of his guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410DEC003810605

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

The applicant retracted his previous statements and denied his guilt. He requested a confidential meeting with his lawyer, Ms V., before the interview but this was refused.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1126DEC004432098

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2002

26 novembre 2002

    Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0205JUD000568206

Admin. suprême

5 février 2015

5 février 2015

Federation, a judge cannot be held liable for an expression of opinion in the course of the administration of justice or for the judgment handed down [by him or her] unless he or she has been found guilty

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:1219DEC000260465

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 1967

19 décembre 1967

Detention pending trial constituted a "special sacrifice" ("Sonderopfer") which an individual, whether guilty or not, had to make for the maintenance of an effective administration of justice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0511DEC003966198

Admin. suprême

11 mai 1999

11 mai 1999

  The applicant pleaded not guilty and was tried in Plymouth Crown Court before a judge and jury.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0905REP002210793

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 1995

5 septembre 1995

He pleaded guilty to the former and not guilty to the latter charge.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD006912210

Admin. suprême

11 février 2014

11 février 2014

The court noted that in the civil proceedings the applicant had not been found guilty of any crime.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1205DEC003557497

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2000

5 décembre 2000

or is not guilty by reason of insanity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2523

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2007

27 septembre 2007

The court of appeal considered, on the basis of the principle that any reasonable doubt must benefit the accused ( in dubio pro reo) , that the applicant’s guilt had not been established.

Source officielle

Page 43 sur 692

← PrécédentSuivant →