AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Chambre 01
69f5d2fccdc6046d475083ab
7 avril 2026
7 avril 2026
2025F00661 DEMANDEUR ASSOCIATION CONGES INTEMPERIES BTP - CAISSE DE L'ILE DE FRANCE [Adresse 1] comparant par la SELARL [Adresse 2] [Adresse 3] DEFENDEUR SARL [Adresse 4] comparant par Me Nicole DELAY
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC003309903
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
In a letter of 10 July 2003 the President acknowledged the delays and informed the applicant that the proceedings should be conducted without further delays.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1964
8 juillet 2008
8 juillet 2008
The applicant had directly suffered the consequences of such a delay.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-152366
19 janvier 2015
19 janvier 2015
The delay occurred mostly due to difficulty by the District Court to obtain the case-file.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223DEC004832608
23 février 2016
23 février 2016
However, they maintained that the delay in its enforcement was excessive.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0504DEC005889300
4 mai 2004
4 mai 2004
As a result, the hearing had to be rescheduled for 2 September 1997, which caused a delay of four and a half months.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-99455
3 juin 2010
3 juin 2010
The European Court drew attention in particular to three periods of delay attributable to the authorities: - a delay of eight months by the Special
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146426
26 août 2014
26 août 2014
Did the procedure for determination of the candidate’s eligibility contain sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrary decisions, preventing arbitrary or unreasonable delays in registration?
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC004436905
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
They also pointed to several delays in the proceedings. The Court observes that the applicants’ constitutional complaint was directed exclusively against the Rimavská Sobota District Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0618DEC000368104
18 juin 2015
18 juin 2015
The Court has frequently held that an unreasonably long delay in the enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia , no. 59498/00, § 37, ECHR 2002-III).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0421DEC000949213
21 avril 2020
21 avril 2020
On 14 August 2012 the court rejected this claim because the applicant herself had caused the delay by not submitting the writ of execution to a competent treasury office in time.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1202DEC002416905
2 décembre 2010
2 décembre 2010
The compensation for enforcement delays granted by domestic courts On 26 April 2010 the Staryy Oskol City Court of the Belgorod Region granted the applicant’s claim for damages resulting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC004234106
27 septembre 2011
27 septembre 2011
The Court notes that there was a delay before the first instance court and the cassation instance of about four years.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC001920813
13 décembre 2016
13 décembre 2016
While there are obvious distinctions as regards different continuing situations (ibid.), the Court considers that the applicant must, in any event, introduce his or her complaint “without undue delay”,
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913DEC003306707
13 septembre 2011
13 septembre 2011
However, the applicant also caused delays.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0903DEC007082901
3 septembre 2002
3 septembre 2002
Istanbul Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi) against his debtors and requested additional compensation ( munzam zarar ) under Article 105 of the Code of Obligations, for the damage he sustained as a result of the delay
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0421DEC000935513
21 avril 2020
21 avril 2020
On 17 July 2012 the court rejected this claim because the applicant himself had caused the delay by not submitting the writ of execution to a competent treasury office in time.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13874
18 octobre 2022
18 octobre 2022
The Government had thus satisfied the burden of showing that that remedy, which had been available at the relevant time, had been in principle effective to expedite investigation proceedings where delays
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3019
9 novembre 2006
9 novembre 2006
, the very least the police could have been expected to do was to verify as rapidly as possible which authority, if any, had taken the women into custody and to open an investigation without further delay
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0317DEC000188218
17 mars 2020
17 mars 2020
earlier but it had regard to the explanations advanced by the prosecution, and to determinations of the Superior Courts in delay cases, and formed the view that the delay in itself was not such as to preclude
Source officiellePage 43 sur 868