CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

17 343 résultats pour « Delpy »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

TCOM

Chambre 01

69f5d2fccdc6046d475083ab

Commerce

7 avril 2026

7 avril 2026

2025F00661 DEMANDEUR ASSOCIATION CONGES INTEMPERIES BTP - CAISSE DE L'ILE DE FRANCE [Adresse 1] comparant par la SELARL [Adresse 2] [Adresse 3] DEFENDEUR SARL [Adresse 4] comparant par Me Nicole DELAY

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC003309903

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2007

2 octobre 2007

In a letter of 10 July 2003 the President acknowledged the delays and informed the applicant that the proceedings should be conducted without further delays.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1964

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

The applicant had directly suffered the consequences of such a delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-152366

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2015

19 janvier 2015

The delay occurred mostly due to difficulty by the District Court to obtain the case-file.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223DEC004832608

Admin. suprême

23 février 2016

23 février 2016

However, they maintained that the delay in its enforcement was excessive.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0504DEC005889300

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2004

4 mai 2004

As a result, the hearing had to be rescheduled for 2   September 1997, which caused a delay of four and a half months.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-99455

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2010

3 juin 2010

The European Court drew attention in particular to three periods of delay attributable to the authorities: -           a delay of eight months by the Special

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146426

Admin. suprême

26 août 2014

26 août 2014

Did the procedure for determination of the candidate’s eligibility contain sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrary decisions, preventing arbitrary or unreasonable delays in registration?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC004436905

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2009

20 octobre 2009

They also pointed to several delays in the proceedings. The Court observes that the applicants’ constitutional complaint was directed exclusively against the Rimavská Sobota District Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0618DEC000368104

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2015

18 juin 2015

The Court has frequently held that an unreasonably long delay in the enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v.   Russia , no. 59498/00, § 37, ECHR 2002-III).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0421DEC000949213

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2020

21 avril 2020

On 14 August 2012 the court rejected this claim because the applicant herself had caused the delay by not submitting the writ of execution to a competent treasury office in time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1202DEC002416905

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2010

2 décembre 2010

    The compensation for enforcement delays granted by domestic courts On 26 April 2010 the Staryy Oskol City Court of the Belgorod Region granted the applicant’s claim for damages resulting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC004234106

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2011

27 septembre 2011

The Court notes that there was a delay before the first instance court and the cassation instance of about four years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC001920813

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2016

13 décembre 2016

While there are obvious distinctions as regards different continuing situations (ibid.), the Court considers that the applicant must, in any event, introduce his or her complaint “without undue delay”,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913DEC003306707

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2011

13 septembre 2011

However, the applicant also caused delays.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0903DEC007082901

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2002

3 septembre 2002

Istanbul Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi) against his debtors and requested additional compensation ( munzam zarar ) under Article 105 of the Code of Obligations, for the damage he sustained as a result of the delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0421DEC000935513

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2020

21 avril 2020

On 17 July 2012 the court rejected this claim because the applicant himself had caused the delay by not submitting the writ of execution to a competent treasury office in time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13874

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2022

18 octobre 2022

The Government had thus satisfied the burden of showing that that remedy, which had been available at the relevant time, had been in principle effective to expedite investigation proceedings where delays

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3019

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

, the very least the police could have been expected to do was to verify as rapidly as possible which authority, if any, had taken the women into custody and to open an investigation without further delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0317DEC000188218

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2020

17 mars 2020

earlier but it had regard to the explanations advanced by the prosecution, and to determinations of the Superior Courts in delay cases, and formed the view that the delay in itself was not such as to preclude

Source officielle

Page 43 sur 868

← PrécédentSuivant →