CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD004146110
27 novembre 2012
The tortfeasor is not liable for damage if he proves that the damage has been caused through no fault of his own (Article 1064 §§ 1, 2). 60.
Page 43 sur 118
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1125JUD003025103
25 novembre 2010
Such damage is to be compensated at the expense of the federal or regional treasury. Articles 151 and 1099-1101 of the Civil Code provide for compensation for non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0424JUD002318494
24 avril 1998
Damage Pecuniary damage: claim allowed in part. Non-pecuniary damage: claim allowed in part. B. Costs and expenses Claim allowed in full.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0215JUD006841601
15 février 2005
(b) The judge was wrong to hold that [McDonald's] need [not] prove any particular financial loss or special damage provided that damage to its good will was likely.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409REP002475594
9 avril 1997
Chief Constable of Kingston upon Hull cannot be regarded as authoritative support for a wide view of police powers under Thomas v. Sawkins and there is no other precedent. 41.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248191
19 janvier 2026
1 and Article 13 of the Convention relating to damage, destruction and/or continuous lack of access to property arising from the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the lack of any effective
Cour d'Appel
6253cbf5bd3db21cbdd8ebb4
30 novembre 2011
la servitude entraîne de graves désagréments soit l'impossibilité d'accès, de se stationner à proximité, la dangerosité de la traversée de la piste, les nuisances phoniques en raison des engins de damage
ECLI:CEDH:001-157685
7 septembre 2015
At this point, a scuffle ensued between the applicant and the two police officers who had been accompanying him, Special Constable G.G. and Constable S.T.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD000941413
22 octobre 2015
However, while in detention the applicant was under the constant supervision of doctors.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD005633700
15 février 2007
State Responsibility for Damage Act 41.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1124JUD000621514
24 novembre 2015
Damage 84. The applicant claimed 60,000 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage and EUR 150,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD002744707
8 octobre 2015
Damage 36. The applicant claimed 30,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1114JUD006327719
14 novembre 2024
or prevent damage from occurring, ... § 6.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1007DEC001173585
7 octobre 1987
The Commission first recalls the Convention organs' constant case-law according to which the presumption of innocence applies to cases where decisions
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0208JUD006225019
8 février 2022
Damage 60.
Chambre 1-7
6312eedf2e6a8e4f13ca60f3
1 septembre 2022
- Constater l'obstruction des époux [R] à permettre l'accès à leur logement pour la réalisation des travaux commandés par la SCI REYO.
3ème Chbre Cab A2
65f34d91c094c59eadf5851f
21 décembre 2023
barreau de MARSEILLE C O N T R E DEFENDERESSE Madame [F] [O] née le 30 septembre 1962 à MARSEILLE, demeurant et domiciliée 122 Boulevard Notre Dame 13006 MARSEILLE représentée par Maître Sylvain DAMAZ
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0609JUD002211802
9 juin 2005
On 15 June 1998 the applicant brought proceedings against four publishing houses seeking recognition of his copyright and an award of damages.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1125JUD007775701
25 novembre 2003
Damage 53. The applicant claimed 150,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 54.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0618JUD000092403
18 juin 2009
On 21 September 2006 the Primorskiy District Court, after a fresh examination, dismissed the applicant’s claim for compensation for non ‑ pecuniary damage.