second-hand cars from European Union Member State: inadmissible   Facts – The applicants, who wished to register in Romania vehicles purchased in other member States of the European Union, had been charged

On 20 March 2014 he was charged in Uzbekistan with membership of the Islamic Party of Uzbekistan, a banned religious community.

  The applicant company was charged with the following offences:     A.

Christian X..., demeurant "Le Charmy" à Avulligoz-Publier, Evian (Haute-Savoie), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 20 avril 1993 par la cour d'appel de Chambéry (Chambre sociale), au profit du Crédit agricole

dérivation des eaux souterraines et les travaux d'établissement des périmètres de protection autour de la source de Merdry, autorisé le prélèvement de l'eau dans le milieu naturel et autorisé la commune de Charmes-Saint-Valbert

The case received massive media coverage, both before and after the police investigation that led to the applicant being charged. 6.

They were charged on 19   April 1990. 21.

Shortly afterwards, the second applicant was charged with the same offence.

Having regard to the nature, character and type of offences with which the accused are charged, as well as the gravity of the charges, the potential penalty ... the panel considers that there is a real

He was subsequently brought before the Lublin District Prosecutor ( Prokurator Rejonowy) and charged with armed robbery.

(PIERRE) DU CHEF D'HOMICIDE INVOLONTAIRE; VU LA REQUETE PRESENTEE PAR MAITRE CHAREYRE, AVOCAT EN LA COUR, AU NOM DE PIERRE X...

24530/94 Judgment 21.12.2000 [Section II] Article 5 Article 5-4 Review of lawfulness of detention Absence of proper and speedy review of lawfulness of detention: violation Facts : The applicant was charged

tribunal Impartiality of judge having previously participated in confirmation of indictment: inadmissible In an order made by Madrid Central Military Judge No. 1 the applicant, a regular soldier, was charged

Law : Article 6 § 2 – Applicability : The Government submitted that Article 6 § 2 was not applicable because the applicant had not been charged with an offence in the defamation proceedings complained

On 31 May 2007 the applicant was found guilty as charged and sentenced to ten months’ imprisonment, suspended for three years, but this judgment was quashed on appeal on 29 January 2008.

36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Communicated on 24 October 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 45768/12 Sinan ERASLAN against Turkey lodged on 7 May 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant was charged

The audit detected a number of violations and the applicant was charged with two counts of abuse of power and two counts of the use of budgetary funds for unauthorised purposes.

On 28 August 2013 the applicant was charged by the police with an administrative offence, namely threatening and insulting V.I.

In 2004 the first-instance court found that the applicant had committed the offences with which he was charged, but went on to discontinue the criminal proceedings after noting that the limitation period