According to the applicant, she asked to be dismissed because she felt that she would no longer be able to work at the embassy because of the tense relations between her and her colleagues. 7 .

He argued that they had incriminated the applicant when questioned by the experts only because they had been swayed by their mother.

I. stated that she was experiencing constant psychological pressure and felt unsafe because of the applicant’s threats to take P. away from her. 11 .

Nor were they able to leave the country, because they could not re-enter without valid documents.

On 1   December 1993 the trial was adjourned because the applicant had refused to leave his cell. 15.

they are men and should not publicly flaunt a same-sex relationship, because he considers that a public display by homosexuals of their relationship is morally unacceptable and because a law on civil

be expected to report it because they were unaware of the requirement to report it.

S.V. verbalises the wish that in the divorce proceedings the custody of the children be awarded to him primarily because he wants the children to be happy.

  It found that the applicant had not been properly summoned to the court hearing because the District Court had used the wrong form.

During the subsequent hearing on 10 April 1997 the trial was adjourned because of the absence of 27 witnesses.

s lawyer were absent; the third because the applicant was ill and could not attend; and the fourth because neither the applicant, who was ill, nor Mr M.T. appeared.

did not attend and one was postponed because a witness did not attend. 13 .

In particular, she had firstly failed to inform the Fund in a timely manner of her marriage to I.Š., whereas her marriage to I.Š. had been annulled partly because of her own actions. 2.

R.P. testified that on that day, which was his birthday, he had cut his veins because his father had called him and insulted him.

Another two hearings were partially conducted, but had to be rescheduled because not all the witnesses or experts had appeared.

Subsequently, while in prison, he prepared an appeal to the Supreme Court without legal assistance, but did not attend the hearing, allegedly because he did not receive the summons.

However, the court considered that, because the reasonable time had been exceeded, it was appropriate to impose a lighter penalty.

  1 that his property rights were violated as well because, even though his constitutional complaint was successful, the Constitutional Court did not award him costs of his legal representation.

written confirmation by the Central Election Commission that he was ineligible to stand for election to the Presidency and the House of Peoples of the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina because