against the United Kingdom and Andrew GILLON against the United Kingdom The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 13   June   2017 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

comparant-assisté de Maître Romuald PALAO, avocat au barreau de BAYONNE INTIMEE : LA SAS FAURE HERMAN Route de Bonnétable BP 20154 72406 LA FERTE BERNARD CEDEX représentée par Maître Cécile BERAUD

  He was an employee of the private company Filippo Fochi Energia S.r.l., which became insolvent and, in June 1995, was placed in “extraordinary administration”.

    The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Mr   Alessandro Lorenzi, a lawyer practising in Carcare.

They eventually introduced Law no. 2215/1994 which was passed by Parliament on 16 April 1994 and became law with effect from 11 May 1994.

I also wish to add that because of their actions I have had health problems and as a result have been on sick leave from 13 to 27 January ...” 18.

that the takings in 1978 and 1984 (excluding the two small parcels which were the subject of the 2012 re ‑ expropriations) were in breach of Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention because

However, they were unable to adopt V. because in October 2004 Belarus decided to suspend all international adoption procedures.

    On 21 December 1989 the applicants became the owners of the flat. 8.

The court adjourned the hearing because of irregularities in the summoning of witnesses. 24.     The next hearing was held on 21 September 2005. Witness no.

Représentée par Me Laurent PATE, avocat au barreau de METZ INTIMÉE : CEGEME-CENTRE DE GESTION DES METIERS 5 Boulevard de la Défense 57070 METZ Représentée par Me Alexandra DUQUESNE-THEOBALD, avocat

    The applications concern the failure of the State authorities to pay debts because of the non-enforcement of assignment orders ( ordinanze di assegnazione ) aimed at implementing decisions

  119/2009, the single-member first-instance civil court of Athens dismissed the applicants’ application, holding that the applicants lacked locus standi because, pursuant to Articles 8 and 18 of

According to the registrar’s transcript, prison staff replied that it was not possible for them to bring the applicant to court because no such service for detainees was available on the dates in question

The applicant found himself in the lowest caste because of the sexual nature of the offence he was convicted of. 7 .

It is unclear who the founders were, because there are two versions of the minutes of the same date, signed by different persons and having different contents.

Iceland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Ledi Bianku,   Aleš Pejchal,   Robert Spano

The hospital, however, refused to admit him because he did not have a valid identity document.

    The judgment of 8 April 1998 became final on 20 May 2000, having been upheld on appeal. 2.     Proceedings in 2001-2004 against the applicant 18.