CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

12 118 résultats pour « Wize »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141019

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2013

20 novembre 2013

In order to ensure the necessary assistance (especially in overcoming trust issues between the applicant and his ex ‑ wife), as well as monitor the realisation of contacts between the applicant

Page 42 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167917

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2016

29 septembre 2016

  Ašmys’ financial transactions with the applicant or his wife been used in the applicant’s criminal case?   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1001JUD006590501

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2002

1 octobre 2002

    The applicant complained that United Kingdom social security legislation discriminated against him and his late wife on grounds of his sex, in breach of Article 14 of the Convention taken

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14189

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2023

26 septembre 2023

Firstly, the list of predicate offences which could trigger forfeiture proceedings was still very wide and was comparable to that under the 2005 Act.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4016

Admin. suprême

22 février 2005

22 février 2005

The applicant moved to Russia to prepare his doctoral thesis, and his wife moved to another town to receive medical treatment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1204DEC003162403

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2007

4 décembre 2007

By a   letter of 20 October 2006 the late applicant’s wife Mrs Věra Klapalová informed the Court that she wished to pursue the application in his stead.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622DEC001786803

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2004

22 juin 2004

In a letter of 31 May 2003 the applicant’s former wife described her and the children’s relationship to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1003JUD007443814

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2019

3 octobre 2019

    The applicant lived in a flat with his wife of 15 years and their son and the latter’s wife and child. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212JUD000765402

Admin. suprême

12 février 2009

12 février 2009

    The applicant’s wife, on his behalf, contested the Government’s objection.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0301DEC001339987

Admin. suprême

1 mars 1991

1 mars 1991

  His memorial was also signed by his wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0219DEC006533401

Admin. suprême

19 février 2002

19 février 2002

The applicant and his wife were married in 1992 and had two children, both born in 1995. The applicant’s wife died on 9 July 1998.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0219DEC006103600

Admin. suprême

19 février 2002

19 février 2002

The applicant and his wife were married in 1977 and had two children, born in 1983 and 1989. The applicant’s wife died on 1 February 1997.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109JUD003612097

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 1999

9 novembre 1999

    The applicant and his wife were married in 1981 and had three children, born in 1984, 1986 and 1990. The applicant’s wife died in 1995. 7.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3010510-3319894

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2010

28 janvier 2010

During his pre-trial detention, Mr Simeonov was likewise unable to see his daughter, a minor, who lived with his wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140738

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2014

6 janvier 2014

of the wife or the husband respectively. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC003731297

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1998

21 octobre 1998

The applicant and his wife have two children, born in 1978 and 1979 respectively.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0316DEC003886502

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2004

16 mars 2004

As a consequence, the applicant's wife and children – a daughter born in 1985 and a son born in 1993 – had been interrogated. His wife had been detained but later released on bail.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705JUD004113898

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2005

5 juillet 2005

, Bazil Moldovan and his wife Lucreţia Moldovan, should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0929DEC001064608

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2015

29 septembre 2015

    The applicant and his wife got married in 1999 and subsequently had two sons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD007814501

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2007

10 mai 2007

    On an unspecified date the applicant's wife brought a civil claim.

Source officielle