CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141019
20 novembre 2013
In order to ensure the necessary assistance (especially in overcoming trust issues between the applicant and his ex ‑ wife), as well as monitor the realisation of contacts between the applicant
Page 42 sur 606
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167917
29 septembre 2016
Ašmys’ financial transactions with the applicant or his wife been used in the applicant’s criminal case? 3.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1001JUD006590501
1 octobre 2002
The applicant complained that United Kingdom social security legislation discriminated against him and his late wife on grounds of his sex, in breach of Article 14 of the Convention taken
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14189
26 septembre 2023
Firstly, the list of predicate offences which could trigger forfeiture proceedings was still very wide and was comparable to that under the 2005 Act.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4016
22 février 2005
The applicant moved to Russia to prepare his doctoral thesis, and his wife moved to another town to receive medical treatment.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1204DEC003162403
4 décembre 2007
By a letter of 20 October 2006 the late applicant’s wife Mrs Věra Klapalová informed the Court that she wished to pursue the application in his stead.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622DEC001786803
22 juin 2004
In a letter of 31 May 2003 the applicant’s former wife described her and the children’s relationship to the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1003JUD007443814
3 octobre 2019
The applicant lived in a flat with his wife of 15 years and their son and the latter’s wife and child. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212JUD000765402
12 février 2009
The applicant’s wife, on his behalf, contested the Government’s objection.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0301DEC001339987
1 mars 1991
His memorial was also signed by his wife.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0219DEC006533401
19 février 2002
The applicant and his wife were married in 1992 and had two children, both born in 1995. The applicant’s wife died on 9 July 1998.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0219DEC006103600
The applicant and his wife were married in 1977 and had two children, born in 1983 and 1989. The applicant’s wife died on 1 February 1997.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109JUD003612097
9 novembre 1999
The applicant and his wife were married in 1981 and had three children, born in 1984, 1986 and 1990. The applicant’s wife died in 1995. 7.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3010510-3319894
28 janvier 2010
During his pre-trial detention, Mr Simeonov was likewise unable to see his daughter, a minor, who lived with his wife.
ECLI:CEDH:001-140738
6 janvier 2014
of the wife or the husband respectively. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC003731297
21 octobre 1998
The applicant and his wife have two children, born in 1978 and 1979 respectively.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0316DEC003886502
16 mars 2004
As a consequence, the applicant's wife and children – a daughter born in 1985 and a son born in 1993 – had been interrogated. His wife had been detained but later released on bail.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705JUD004113898
5 juillet 2005
, Bazil Moldovan and his wife Lucreţia Moldovan, should be struck out of the list.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0929DEC001064608
29 septembre 2015
The applicant and his wife got married in 1999 and subsequently had two sons.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD007814501
10 mai 2007
On an unspecified date the applicant's wife brought a civil claim.