CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1201JUD005585915
1 décembre 2020
No reference is made in the court’s reasoning to E.I.L.’s statement. 18 .
Page 42 sur 65
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR01047
15 mai 2018
. ; Vu le mémoire produit ; Attendu qu'il résulte de l'arrêt attaqué et des pièces de procédure qu'un contrôle effectué par la gendarmerie maritime dans l'établissement "La Marée", au [...], a conduit
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD002560112
17 décembre 2019
Among other things, they disagreed with the amount of the award made in respect of them, and with the lower court’s assessment of the evidence in that connection. 18 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD004273212
10 décembre 2020
that the applicant’s complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD006146314
13 octobre 2022
The Court further observes that the applicants made use of the existing domestic remedy.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD001392721
17 janvier 2023
The payment should be made to the bank account of either of the applicant’s two representatives before the Court, Mr Bakhrom Khamroyev or Ms Zukhra Khamroyeva.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1219JUD001621719
19 décembre 2024
The Government made contradictory statements about whether the denial of food had affected only the first applicant or both.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0302DEC001665490
2 mars 1998
The applicants have repeatedly made attempts to return to their homes and properties in Famagusta.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923JUD003934214
23 septembre 2025
It did not, however, establish how and by whom the second building had been demolished or make any award in respect of that property.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0622JUD006878614
22 juin 2023
In his submissions of 8 April 2022 made in reply to the Government’s observations, the applicant in application no. 33066/16 complained, for the first time, that he had been denied family
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0110JUD005594215
10 janvier 2019
The file also contained submissions made by F.Ž., the applicant’s lawyer in the criminal proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927JUD001985303
27 septembre 2007
In addition, R. agreed to vacate the apartment whenever the applicant made such a demand. 9.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-103898
2 décembre 2010
It may make recommendations and supervises their implementation in the course of subsequent inspections.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0105DEC000706106
5 janvier 2017
The Court attaches particular weight to the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-140891
14 janvier 2014
(a) If yes, what were these reasons and did the national authorities make reasonable effort to secure the presence of the witnesses during trial as requested by the applicants?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410DEC000923005
10 avril 2012
On 29 September 2011 the Court informed the applicants and the applicant companies of the new remedy, asking whether they intended to make use of it within the six-month time-limit set by
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1009JUD003772611
9 octobre 2018
The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1012JUD000835608
12 octobre 2017
: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1130JUD000866009
30 novembre 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1130JUD000288705